Reproductive risks in 35-year-old adults born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight: an observational study
- PMID: 33161502
- PMCID: PMC7940302
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03864-5
Reproductive risks in 35-year-old adults born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight: an observational study
Abstract
Evidence suggests that increased survival over the last decades of very preterm (VPT; gestational age < 32 weeks)- and very low birth weight (VLBW; birth weight < 1500 g)-born infants is not matched by improved outcomes. The objective of our study was to evaluate the reproductive rate, fertility, and pregnancy complications in 35-year-old VPT/VLBW subjects. All Dutch VPT/VLBW infants born alive in 1983 and surviving until age 35 (n = 955) were eligible for a POPS-35 study. A total of 370 (39%) subjects completed a survey on reproductive rate, fertility problems, pregnancy complications, and perinatal outcomes of their offspring. We tested differences in these parameters between the VPT/VLBW subjects and their peers from Dutch national registries. POPS-35 participants had less children than their peers in the CBS registry. They reported more problems in conception and pregnancy complications, including a three times increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy.Conclusion: Reproduction is more problematic in 35-year olds born VPT/VLBW than in the general population, possibly mediated by an increased risk for hypertension, but their offspring have no elevated risk for preterm birth. What is known: At age 28, the Dutch national POPS cohort, born very preterm or with a very low birth in 1983, had lower reproductive rates than the general Dutch population (female 23% versus 32% and male 7% versus 22%). What is new: At age 35, the Dutch POPS cohort still had fewer children than the general Dutch population (female 56% versus 74% and male 40% versus 56%). Females in the POPS cohort had a higher risk of fertility problems and pregnancy complications than their peers in the Dutch national registries, but their offspring had no elevated risk for preterm birth.
Keywords: Preterm-born adults; Reproduction; Very low birth weight; Very preterm.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Mathers C, Black RE. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027–3035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, Landoulsi S, Jampathong N, Kongwattanakul K, Laopaiboon M, Lewis C, Rattanakanokchai S, Teng DN, Thinkhamrop J, Watananirun K, Zhang J, Zhou W, Gülmezoglu AM. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e37–e46. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stoelhorst GMSJ, Rijken M, Marten SE, et al. Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age < 32 Weeks): the Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996-1997. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):396–405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1497. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wolke D, Johnson S, Mendonça M. The life course consequences of very preterm birth. Ann Rev Dev Psychol. 2019;1(1):69–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084804. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources