Influence of sanguinarine-based phytobiotic supplementation on post necrotic enteritis challenge recovery
- PMID: 33163676
- PMCID: PMC7609478
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05361
Influence of sanguinarine-based phytobiotic supplementation on post necrotic enteritis challenge recovery
Abstract
In the animal production industry, plant-derived antimicrobial phytobiotics are used as an alternative to antibiotics. Here we investigated the role sanguinarine-based phytobiotic in broiler recovery from Necrotic Enteritis (NE) infection. A total of 100 one-day-old broiler chicks (Ross 308) were randomly allocated to four treatments: negative control CTR (no challenge, no phytobiotic supplementation); positive control NE (NE challenged); phytobiotic SG (sanguinarine phytobiotic, 0.12 g/kg); and SG + NE, (sanguinarine phytobiotic, 0.12 g/kg and NE challenge). Sanguinarine-based phytobiotic supplementation caused significant changes between the groups in performance, livability and histological measurements, however, these changes were not significantly different between SG + NE and NE groups. Significant improvement was detected in NE lesion score of the duodenum and ileum of SG + NE birds compared to NE challenged birds at the end of the production cycle at 40 days old, indicating improved post-NE recovery with the addition of phytobiotic. Sanguinarine-based phytobiotic supplementation in NE challenged birds significantly compensated for a NE associated reduction of Firmicutes and an increase in Bacteroidetes. Functional profile of sanguinarine-based phytobiotic supplemented birds microbiota was distinct from CTR functional profile. NE challenge was associated with a significant increase in cecal propionic acid, while sanguinarine-based phytobiotic supplementation resulted in an increase in cecal acetic acid.
Keywords: Broiler; Food microbiology; Food safety; Infectious disease; Intestine; Microbiology; Necrotic enteritis; Nutrition; Phytobiotic; Sanguinarine.
© 2020 The Authors.
Figures
References
-
- Windisch W., Schedle K., Plitzner C., Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86(14_suppl):E140–E148. - PubMed
-
- Brenes A., Roura E. Essential oils in poultry nutrition: main effects and modes of action. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010;158(1):1–14.
-
- Abou-Bakr S. Effect of some plant extracts on fungal and aflatoxin production. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2011;3(4)
-
- Dhama K., Tiwari R., Ru K., Chakraborty S.M.G., Karthik K. 2014. Growth Promoters and Novel Feed Additives Improving Poultry Production and Health, Bioactive Principles and Beneficial Applications: the Trends and Advances: A Review; pp. 129–159.
-
- Gopi M., Karthik K., Manjunathachar H.V., Tamilmahan P., Kesavan M., Dashprakash M. Essential oils as a feed additive in poultry nutrition. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2014;2(1):1–7.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
