Biomimetic Nanofibrous 3D Materials for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering
- PMID: 33163910
- PMCID: PMC7641339
- DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00946
Biomimetic Nanofibrous 3D Materials for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering
Abstract
Repair of large bone defects using biomaterials-based strategies has been a significant challenge due to the complex characteristics required for tissue regeneration, especially in the craniofacial region. Tissue engineering strategies aimed at restoration of function face challenges in material selection, synthesis technique, and choice of bioactive factor release in combination with all aforementioned facets. Biomimetic nanofibrous (NF) scaffolds are attractive vehicles for tissue engineering due to their ability to promote endogenous bone regeneration by mimicking the shape and chemistry of natural bone extracellular matrix (ECM). To date, several techniques for generation of biomimetic NF scaffolds have been discovered, each possessing several advantages and drawbacks. This spotlight highlights two of the more popular techniques for biomimetic NF scaffold synthesis: electrospinning and thermally-induced phase separation (TIPS), covering development from inception in each technique as well as discussing the most recent innovations in each fabrication method.
Keywords: Craniofacial bone tissue engineering; Electrospinning 3D scaffolds; Endogenous bone regeneration; Nanofibrous 3D scaffolds; Thermally induced phase separation.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Development of biomimetic electrospun polymeric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. A review.J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019 Oct;30(14):1308-1355. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1630699. Epub 2019 Jul 9. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019. PMID: 31181982 Review.
-
Three-dimensional endothelial cell incorporation within bioactive nanofibrous scaffolds through concurrent emulsion electrospinning and coaxial cell electrospraying.Acta Biomater. 2021 Mar 15;123:312-324. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.035. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Acta Biomater. 2021. PMID: 33508508
-
Suppressing mesenchymal stem cell hypertrophy and endochondral ossification in 3D cartilage regeneration with nanofibrous poly(l-lactic acid) scaffold and matrilin-3.Acta Biomater. 2018 Aug;76:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Acta Biomater. 2018. PMID: 29940371 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to Improve Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 May 5;10(5):887. doi: 10.3390/nano10050887. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32380699 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Novel 3D scaffold with enhanced physical and cell response properties for bone tissue regeneration, fabricated by patterned electrospinning/electrospraying.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016 Sep;27(9):143. doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5748-8. Epub 2016 Aug 22. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016. PMID: 27550014
Cited by
-
Electrospun polycaprolactone incorporated with fluorapatite nanoparticles composite scaffolds enhance healing of experimental calvarial defect on rats.Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jun 30;11(9):313. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4865. Epub 2023 May 25. Ann Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 37404984 Free PMC article.
-
3D-Printed Demineralized Bone Matrix-Based Conductive Scaffolds Combined with Electrical Stimulation for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024 Jul 15;7(7):4366-4378. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00236. Epub 2024 Jun 21. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024. PMID: 38905196 Free PMC article.
-
Dental-derived stem cells in tissue engineering: the role of biomaterials and host response.Regen Biomater. 2023 Nov 10;11:rbad100. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbad100. eCollection 2024. Regen Biomater. 2023. PMID: 38223292 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomimetic Therapeutics for Bone Regeneration: A Perspective on Antiaging Strategies.Macromol Biosci. 2024 Feb;24(2):e2300248. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202300248. Epub 2023 Oct 10. Macromol Biosci. 2024. PMID: 37769439 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D PCL/Gelatin/Genipin Nanofiber Sponge as Scaffold for Regenerative Medicine.Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 16;14(8):2006. doi: 10.3390/ma14082006. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33923751 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pape HC; Evans A; Kobbe P, Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2010, 24 Suppl 1, S36–40. - PubMed
-
- Marino JT; Ziran BH, Use of solid and cancellous autologous bone graft for fractures and nonunions. The Orthopedic clinics of North America 2010, 41 (1), 15–26; table of contents. - PubMed
-
- Arrington ED; Smith WJ; Chambers HG; Bucknell AL; Davino NA, Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1996, (329), 300–9. - PubMed
-
- Kim HD; Amirthalingam S; Kim SL; Lee SS; Rangasamy J; Hwang NS, Biomimetic Materials and Fabrication Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering. Advanced healthcare materials 2017, 6 (23), 1700612. - PubMed
-
- Roseti L; Parisi V; Petretta M; Cavallo C; Desando G; Bartolotti I; Grigolo B, Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications 2017, 78, 1246–1262. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources