Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106
- PMID: 33164066
- DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa198
Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106
Abstract
Background: Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. The aim of this randomized, multicentre phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy to determine the significance of induction chemotherapy.
Methods: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm A) or induction chemotherapy followed by the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm B). Patients in Arm A underwent radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. Patients in Arm B received induction gemcitabine for 12 weeks, and thereafter, only patients with controlled disease underwent the same chemoradiotherapy as Arm A. After chemoradiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival.
Results: Amongst 102 patients enrolled, 100 were eligible for efficacy assessment. The probability of survival was greater in Arm B in the first 12 months, but the trend was reversed in the following periods (1-year survival 66.7 vs. 69.3%, 2-year survival 36.9 vs. 18.9%). The hazard ratio was 1.255 (95% confidence interval 0.816-1.930) in favour of Arm A. Gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly more frequent and three treatment-related deaths occurred in Arm A.
Conclusions: This study suggested that the chemoradiotherapy using S-1 alone had more promising efficacy with longer-term survival, compared with induction gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000006811.
Keywords: S-1; chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine; induction chemotherapy; pancreatic cancer.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2013 Apr;14(4):317-26. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70021-4. Epub 2013 Mar 6. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23474363 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;6(2):128-138. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30330-7. Epub 2020 Dec 16. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 33338442 Clinical Trial.
-
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPACT): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;5(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30327-9. Epub 2020 Jan 14. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 31953079 Clinical Trial.
-
Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia.J Chemother. 2015 Aug;27(4):227-34. doi: 10.1179/1973947815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Mar 20. J Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25790948
-
Is concomitant radiotherapy necessary with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer?World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17648-55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17648. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25516680 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Implications of FDG-PET in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):337-346. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05591-2. Epub 2023 Jan 18. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 36652179
-
Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer in Japan.Cancer Med. 2023 Oct;12(20):20450-20458. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6611. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37795771 Free PMC article.
-
Triple modal treatment comprising with proton beam radiation, hyperthermia, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II study protocol (TT-LAP trial).BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 4;23(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11110-y. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37403011 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of systemic inflammatory response on induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis on systemic inflammatory response in JCOG1106.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 31;53(8):704-713. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad044. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37248668 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma-A Critical Review of Randomised Trials.Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 18;30(7):6820-6837. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070499. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37504359 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical