Functional navigation in hip resurfacing
- PMID: 33164345
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.16312
Functional navigation in hip resurfacing
Abstract
Background: Acetabular malpositioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can result in edge loading, leading to increased wear, pseudotumours and bearing failure. Historically Lewinnek's safe zone has been the goal for optimal THA cup positioning; however, research indicates that one generic safe zone is not ideal. In hip resurfacing (HR) there is a lack of data regarding optimal position, and studies indicate that edge loading is related to increased inclination.
Methods: We used a functional positioning protocol to produce patient-specific (PS) dynamic analyses, identifying individual functional ideal acetabular zones. We hypothesized that identifying and implanting into PS functional ideal zones would result in decreased edge loading and improved clinical outcomes. Fifteen adept HRs were implanted using a PS functional positioning protocol. As plans were created for standard THA acetabular position, adjustments were made intra-operatively.
Results: Dynamic post-operative analyses showed 80% of implants were appropriately positioned. The remaining 20% had edge loading, where implants had inclination ≤5° of planned positioning and 10° of planned anteversion. 60% were ≤10° of planned inclination and anteversion. No pre-operative planned positions were within 'Lewinneks's zone', indicating its questionable relevance, especially in HR. A total of 20% of patients developed pain; however, at 1 year post-operatively all patients recorded improved Oxford hip scores.
Conclusion: This study confirms that functional positioning in HR consistently results in improved precision and accuracy in achieving the functional acetabular ideal zone, leading to improved clinical outcomes and prevention of edge loading.
Keywords: arthroplasty; functional navigation; hip resurfacing; orthopaedic surgery.
© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Moskal JT, Capps SG. Improving the accuracy of acetabular component orientation. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2010; 18: 286-96.
-
- Wera GD, Ting NT, Moric M et al. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 710-5.
-
- Marel E, Walter L, Solomon M et al. Investigation of patient-specific acetabular cup malorientation in functional positions in the failing total hip replacement. Orthop. Proc. 2018; 98-B(3):20.
-
- Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S et al. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2010; 92: 1072-8.
-
- Australian Orthopaedic Association. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2018 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA, 2018.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials