Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 17;38(49):7865-7873.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.063. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Global assessment of national mandatory vaccination policies and consequences of non-compliance

Affiliations

Global assessment of national mandatory vaccination policies and consequences of non-compliance

Katie Gravagna et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Background: Declining vaccination coverage and increasing hesitancy is a worldwide concern. Many countries have implemented mandatory vaccination policies to promote vaccination. However, mandatory vaccination policies differ significantly by country. Beyond case studies, no comprehensive study has compared these policies or the penalties for non-compliance on a global scale.

Methods: We conducted extensive keyword, policy, and literature searches to identify mandatory national vaccination policies globally and develop a comprehensive database. A mandatory national vaccination policy was defined as a policy from a national authority that requires individuals to receive at least one vaccination based on age or to access a service. Two reviewers independently evaluated evidence for a mandate and whether non-compliance penalties were incorporated. We categorized penalties into four types, based on the nature of the penalty. These penalties impact an individual's financial, parental rights, educational (i.e., child's school entry and access), and liberty status. We rated the severity within each category.

Results: Of 193 countries investigated, 54% (n = 105) had evidence of a nationwide mandate as of December 2018. The frequency, types, and severity of penalties varied widely across all regions. We found that 59% (n = 62) of countries with national mandates defined at least one penalty for non-compliance with a vaccine mandate. Among those, educational penalties (i.e., limiting a child's entry or ongoing access to school) were the most common (69%; n = 43), with most countries with educational penalties refusing school enrollment until vaccination requirements are met (81%; n = 35).

Conclusion: We undertook a comprehensive assessment of national mandatory vaccination policies and identified a diversity of penalties in place to promote compliance. Our results highlight the need to critically evaluate the implementation of non-compliance penalties in order to determine their effectiveness and to define best practices for sustaining high vaccination uptake worldwide.

Keywords: Compliance; Mandatory; Penalties; Policy; Vaccination; Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and have no conflicts of interest to declare. NEB has received research grants from the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the US National Institutes of Health; KG had financial support from the Grand Challenges Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP) of the University of Minnesota; there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Research process for identifying and categorizing national mandatory vaccination policies and associated penalties for non-compliance.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Classification scheme used in this global analysis of national mandatory vaccination policies to categorize the severity of each penalty type for: (a) financial penalties; (b) parental penalties; (c) educational penalties; (d) liberty penalties.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Distribution of national mandatory vaccination policies globally, further categorized based on whether evidence was obtained that the policy includes penalties for non-compliance.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Global distribution of the types of penalties in countries with national mandatory vaccination policies for: (a) financial penalties; (b) parental penalties; (c) educational penalties; (d) liberty penalties.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Regional distribution of penalty types and severity within those types identified in countries with evidence of a national mandatory vaccination policy; (A) financial penalties; (B) parental penalties; (C) educational penalties; (D) liberty penalties.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vanderslott S. OurWorldInData.org; 2018. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/vaccine-preventable-diseases [accessed 18th November 2019].
    1. Roush SW, Murphy TV. Vaccine-preventable disease table working G. historical comparisons of morbidity and mortality for vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States. JAMA 2007;298:2155–63. - PubMed
    1. Pezzotti P, Bellino S, Prestinaci F, et al. The impact of immunization programs on 10 vaccine preventable diseases in Italy: 1900–2015. Vaccine 2018;36:1435–43. - PubMed
    1. Global Vaccine Action Plan: 2011–2020. World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/immunization/global_vaccine_action_plan/GVAP_doc_201... [accessed 18th November 2019].
    1. Larson HJ, de Figueiredo A, Xiahong Z, et al. The state of vaccine confidence 2016: global insights through a 67-country survey. EBioMedicine 2016;12:295–301. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types