Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 1;100(5):501-512.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001637.

Narrative Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation of People With Spinal Cord Injury: 2010-2020

Affiliations
Review

Narrative Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation of People With Spinal Cord Injury: 2010-2020

Lynn H Gerber et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines provide reliable, vetted, and critical information to bring research to practice. Some medical specialties (e.g., physical medicine and rehabilitation) provide multidomain treatment for various conditions. This presents challenges because physical medicine and rehabilitation is a small specialty, a diverse patient base in terms sociodemographics and diagnosis, treatments are difficult to standardize, and rehabilitation research is underfunded. We wished to identify quality and applicability of clinical practice guidelines and searched "Spinal Cord Injury AND Clinical Practice Guidelines AND Rehabilitation" and vetting process.Three hundred fifty-nine articles were identified of which 58 met all criteria for full-text review of which 13 were included in the final selection. Additional publications were accessed from a nondatabase search. Five articles addressed postacute care, community treatment. Nine articles had no recorded vetting process but addressed rehabilitation as an outcome and were included separately. Many of the clinical practice guidelines were developed without evidence from randomized controlled trials, one had input from stakeholders, and some are out of date and do not address important aspects of changes in demographics of the affected population and the use of newer technologies such as sensors and robotics and devices. Identification of these gaps may help stimulate treatment that is clinically relevant, accessible, and current.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.

References

    1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center: 2018 Annual Statistical Report for the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems. Birmingham, AL, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Available at: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/reports.aspx . Accessed June 23, 2020
    1. Wilson JR, Cronin S, Fehlings MG, et al.: Epidemiology and impact of spinal cord injury in the elderly: results of a fifteen-year population-based cohort study. J Neurotrauma 2020;37:1740–51
    1. Spinal cord injury (SCI) 2016 facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2016;39:493–4
    1. Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, et al.: Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993–2012. JAMA 2015;313:2236–43
    1. Toda M, Nakatani E, Omae K, et al.: Age-specific characterization of spinal cord injuries over a 19-year period at a Japanese rehabilitation center. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195120

Publication types

MeSH terms