Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Nov;37(6):599-605.
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000716.

Utilization of MEG Among the US Epilepsy Centers: A Survey-Based Appraisal

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Utilization of MEG Among the US Epilepsy Centers: A Survey-Based Appraisal

Anto I Bagić et al. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The purported underutilization of magnetoencephalography (MEG) among the USA epilepsy centers has never been studied, and any evidence-based understanding of its magnitude is lacking.

Methods: Two hundred twenty-five National Association of Epilepsy Centers centers (2016) were invited to participate anonymously in a 13-question web-based survey of clinical practice focused on MEG use.

Results: On average, centers (N = 70; 61 of which were level 4) reported <6 epileptologists, >7 dedicated epilepsy monitoring unit beds, 206 phase 1 studies, 15 phase 2 studies, 10 direct resections, and 9 indirect resections; 27% owned MEG. On average, 11.2 MEGs per year were ordered for epilepsy localization and 7.6 for any presurgical mapping modalities. Wada test aka the intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure (ISAP) (43%) and functional MRI (29%) were preferred over MEG (4%) for language mapping. The number of epileptologists and the number of epilepsy monitoring unit beds correlated positively with the most clinical volumes. The centers who own a MEG had surgical volumes significantly higher than those without. The number and complexity of patients as well as the proximity of a MEG were perceived as significant contributors/obstacles to increased MEG use.

Conclusions: Only the centers with larger surgical volumes incorporate MEG regularly in presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. A reversal of the pervasive underutilization of epilepsy surgery can benefit from MEG, but this requires a sustained concerted promotion by the epilepsy and MEG communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M; Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med 2001;345:311–318.
    1. Engel J Jr, McDermott MP, Wiebe S, et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012;307:922–930.
    1. Engel J Jr, Wiebe S, French J, et al. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology 2003;60:538–547.
    1. Najm I, Jehi L, Palmini A, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Paglioli E, Bingaman W. Temporal patterns and mechanisms of epilepsy surgery failure. Epilepsia 2013;54:772–782.
    1. Sperling MR, Barshow S, Nei M, Asadi-Pooya AA. A reappraisal of mortality after epilepsy surgery. Neurology 2016;86:1938–1944.

Publication types

MeSH terms