Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):826-837.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa183.

Acuity Differences Among Newly Admitted Older Residents in Rural and Urban Nursing Homes

Yvonne Jonk  1   2 , Deborah Thayer  1   2 , Karen Mauney  2 , Zachariah Croll  1   2 , Catherine McGuire  2 , Andrew F Coburn  1   2
Affiliations

Acuity Differences Among Newly Admitted Older Residents in Rural and Urban Nursing Homes

Yvonne Jonk et al. Gerontologist. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Our primary objective was to assess rural-urban acuity differences among newly admitted older nursing home residents.

Research design and methods: Data included the 2015 Minimum Data Set v3.0, the Area Health Resources File, the Provider of Services File, and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Activities of daily living, the Cognitive Function Scale, and aggression/wandering indicators were used to assess functional, cognitive, and behavioral status, respectively. Excluding assessments for short stays (less than 90 days), assessments for 209,719 newly admitted long-stay residents aged 65 and older across 14,834 facilities in 47 states were evaluated. Difference in differences (DID) generalized linear models with state-fixed effects and clustering by facilities were used to assess the interaction effect of older age (75 plus) on rural-urban acuity differences, controlling for socioeconomic factors, admission source, and market characteristics.

Results: Residents admitted to rural facilities were less functionally impaired (incidence rate ratio: 0.973-0.898) but had more cognitive (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03-1.22) and problem behaviors (OR: 1.19-1.48) than urban. Although older age was predictive of higher acuity, in DID models, the expected decline in functional status was comparable in rural and urban facilities, while the cognitive and behavioral status for older admissions was 8.0% and 8.5% lower in rural versus urban facilities, respectively.

Discussion and implications: Although the higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and problem behaviors among rural admissions was attributable in part to older age, rural facilities admitted less complex individuals among older age residents than urban facilities. Findings may reflect less capacity to manage older, complex individuals in rural facilities.

Keywords: Cognition; Function/mobility; Home- and community-based care and services; Nursing homes; Rural and urban issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types