Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov:4:1039-1050.
doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00110.

Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology

Affiliations

Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology

Kaustav Bera et al. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Tumor stage and grade, visually assessed by pathologists from evaluation of pathology images in conjunction with radiographic imaging techniques, have been linked to outcome, progression, and survival for a number of cancers. The gold standard of staging in oncology has been the TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging system. Though histopathological grading has shown prognostic significance, it is subjective and limited by interobserver variability even among experienced surgical pathologists. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have been applied to pathology images toward diagnostic-, prognostic-, and treatment prediction-related tasks in cancer. AI approaches have the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional TNM staging and tumor grading approaches, providing a direct prognostic prediction of disease outcome independent of tumor stage and grade. Broadly speaking, these AI approaches involve extracting patterns from images that are then compared against previously defined disease signatures. These patterns are typically categorized as either (1) handcrafted, which involve domain-inspired attributes, such as nuclear shape, or (2) deep learning (DL)-based representations, which tend to be more abstract. DL approaches have particularly gained considerable popularity because of the minimal domain knowledge needed for training, mostly only requiring annotated examples corresponding to the categories of interest. In this article, we discuss AI approaches for digital pathology, especially as they relate to disease prognosis, prediction of genomic and molecular alterations in the tumor, and prediction of treatment response in oncology. We also discuss some of the potential challenges with validation, interpretability, and reimbursement that must be addressed before widespread clinical deployment. The article concludes with a brief discussion of potential future opportunities in the field of AI for digital pathology and oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anant Madabhushi

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Elucid Bioimaging

Consulting or Advisory Role: Inspirata, Aiforia

Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (I), AstraZeneca (I)

No potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Representative handcrafted artificial intelligence approaches used in digital pathology. (A) Cell cluster graph approaches used in lung adenocarcinomas prognosis. (B) Global and local graph approaches used in lung squamous cell carcinomas recurrence prediction. (C) Tumor cell multinucleation index as a prognostic marker in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. (D) Local cell graph of cellular shape and architecture for prognosis prediction in oral cancer. (E) Architecture of tumor nuclei clusters in non–small-cell lung cancer, which are morphologically correlated with radiomic features. (F) Cellular diversity approaches reflecting on differences in orientation of tumor nuclei in oral cancer. (G) Diversity of nuclear shape in tumor cells as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer. (H) Spatial architecture and orientation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in non–small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosen RD, Sapra A. TNM Classification: StatPearls. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553187/ - PubMed
    1. Sopik V, Narod SA. The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: On the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170:647–656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foulkes WD. Size surprise? Tumour size, nodal status, and outcome after breast cancer. Curr Oncol. 2012;19:241–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Lee AHS, et al. Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3153–3158. - PubMed
    1. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, et al. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: The role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:207. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types