Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):531.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02936-y.

Assessing psychological adjustment and cultural reintegration after military service: development and psychometric evaluation of the post-separation Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM)

Madeline Romaniuk  1   2   3   4 , Gina Fisher  5 , Chloe Kidd  5 , Philip J Batterham  6
Affiliations

Assessing psychological adjustment and cultural reintegration after military service: development and psychometric evaluation of the post-separation Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM)

Madeline Romaniuk et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: The transition out of military service and subsequent reintegration to civilian life has been established as a period associated with an increased risk of psychological adjustment difficulties, psychiatric disorders and suicide risk, yet no tool exists to measure cultural and psychological adjustment following permanent separation from the military. This study describes the two-phase mixed-methods development and validation of the self-report Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM).

Methods: In Phase I, four focus groups (n = 20) and semi-structured one-on-one interviews (n = 80) enabled thematic analysis and generation of 53 initial items that were reviewed by an expert multidisciplinary panel (n = 12) and piloted for clarity and relevance in an Australian service-veteran sample (n = 11). In Phase II, psychometric properties of the 47 items resulting from Phase I were evaluated with online assessment of a convenience sample of transitioned Australian Defence Force veterans (n = 725). Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as evaluation of test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and convergent, divergent and discriminant validity.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis on a randomized split-half sample (n = 357), resulted in a 21-item, five-factor solution of Purpose and Connection, Help seeking, Beliefs about civilians, Resentment and regret, and Regimentation, explaining 53.22% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (n = 368) verified this factor structure without modification (χ2 = 304.96, df = 160; CFI = .96, TLI = .94, NFI = .91, RMSEA = .05). Strong convergent, divergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated as M-CARM scores significantly correlated with related constructs assessed by standardised clinical measures as well as differentiated groups based on three binary reintegration items, with large effect sizes (d = > 1). Strong test-retest reliability for the total score (n = 186, r = .93) and excellent internal consistency (n = 725, a = .90) were also found.

Conclusions: Results provide promising evidence the M-CARM is a valid, reliable measure of psychological and cultural reintegration to civilian life, with potential for considerable clinical and research application.

Keywords: Adjustment; Defence; Military; Psychometric measure; Reintegration; Scale development; Transition; Veteran.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Five-Factor model with a Higher Order Factor of Adjustment and Reintegration
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
M-CARM Scoring Profile Examples
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Elnitsky CA, Blevins CL, Fisher MP, Magruder K. Military service member and veteran reintegration: a critical review and adapted ecological model. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(2):114. doi: 10.1037/ort0000244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elnitsky CA, Fisher MP, Blevins CL. Military service member and veteran reintegration: a conceptual analysis, unified definition, and key domains. Front Psychol. 2017;8:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00369. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gil-Rivas V, Kilmer RP, Larson JC, Armstrong LM. Facilitating successful reintegration: attending to the needs of military families. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(2):176. doi: 10.1037/ort0000201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adler DA, Possemato K, Mavandadi S, Lerner D, Chang H, Klaus J, et al. Psychiatric status and work performance of veterans of operations enduring freedom and Iraqi freedom. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(1):39–46. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.1.39. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castro CA, Dursun S. Military veteran reintegration: approach, management, and assessment of military veterans transitioning to civilian life: academic press. 2019.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources