Clothianidin decomposition in Missouri wetland soils
- PMID: 33169408
- DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20175
Clothianidin decomposition in Missouri wetland soils
Abstract
Neonicotinoid pesticides can persist in soils for extended time periods; however, they also have a high potential to contaminate ground and surface waters. Studies have reported negative effects associated with neonicotinoids and nontarget taxa, including aquatic invertebrates, pollinating insect species, and insectivorous birds. This study evaluated factors associated with clothianidin (CTN) degradation and sorption in Missouri wetland soils to assess the potential for wetland soils to mitigate potential environmental risks associated with neonicotinoids. Solid-to-solution partition coefficients (Kd ) for CTN sorption to eight wetland soils were determined via single-point sorption experiments, and sorption isotherm experiments were conducted using the two most contrasting soils. Clothianidin degradation was determined under oxic and anoxic conditions over 60 d. Degradation data were fit to zero- and first-order kinetic decay models to determine CTN half-life (t0.5 ). Sorption results indicated CTN sorption to wetland soil was relatively weak (average Kd , 3.58 L kg-1 ); thus, CTN has the potential to be mobile and bioavailable within wetland soils. However, incubation results showed anoxic conditions significantly increased CTN degradation rates in wetland soils (anoxic average t0.5 , 27.2 d; oxic average t0.5 , 149.1 d). A significant negative correlation was observed between anoxic half-life values and soil organic C content (r2 = .782; p = .046). Greater CTN degradation rates in wetland soils under anoxic conditions suggest that managing wetlands to facilitate anoxic conditions could mitigate CTN presence in the environment and reduce exposure to nontarget organisms.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Anderson, J. C., Dubetz, C., & Palace, V. P. (2015). Neonicotinoids in the Canadian aquatic environment: A literature review on current use product with a focus on fate, exposure, and biological effects. Science of the Total Environment, 505, 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.090
-
- Berheim, E. H., Jenks, J. A., Lundgren, J. G., Michel, E. S., Grove, D., & Jensen, W. F. (2019). Effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on physiology and reproductive characteristics of captive female and fawn white-tailed deer. Scientific Reports, 9, 4534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40994-9
-
- Bonmatin, J. M., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., … Tapparo, A. (2015). Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(1), 35-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7
-
- Bonmatin, J. M., Moineau, I., Charvet, R., Colin, M., Fleche, C., & Bengsch, E. R. (2005). Behaviour of imidacloprid in fields: Toxicity for honey bees. In E. Lichtfouse, J. Schwarzbauer, & D. Robert (Eds.), Environmental chemistry (pp. 483-494). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
-
- Botías, C., David, A., Hill, E. M., & Goulson, D. (2016). Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seed-treated crops, and implications for non-target insects. Science of the Total Environment, 566-567, 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.065
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
