Consent and refusal of treatment by older children in emergency settings
- PMID: 33169517
- DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13685
Consent and refusal of treatment by older children in emergency settings
Abstract
The law recognises that children can exert an increasing level of autonomy and decision-making about their healthcare as they mature, and that intelligence and maturity levels will vary from one child to the next. Therefore, the parameters for when older children can consent to healthcare can be a complex area for clinicians to navigate. Refusal of treatment provides additional challenges for clinicians because the law is less clear about when older children can be involved in refusing treatment which is in their best interests. This article outlines relevant legislation concerning child consent to treatment across Australian jurisdictions and examines refusal of treatment by children using the 2018 case of Mercy Hospitals Victoria v D1 & Anor.
Keywords: adolescent; capacity; child; consent to treatment; emergency medicine; refusal of treatment.
© 2020 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.
References
-
- Grootens-Weigers P, Hein IM, van den Broek JM, de Vries MC. Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects. BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17: 1-6.
-
- Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority, 1985, 3 All ER 402.
-
- Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (Marion's case), 1992, 175 CLR 218.
-
- Re MB. 8 Med LR 217, 1997.
-
- Lennings N. Forward, Gillick: are competent children autonomous medical decision makers? New developments in Australia. J. Law Biosci. 2015; 2: 459-65.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources