Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 10;10(11):e041730.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041730.

Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review

Affiliations

Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review

Carla Strubbia et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To map the extant literature evaluating the use of technology for goal setting in adult rehabilitation and the impact of technology for patient outcomes.

Design: Scoping review.

Methods: MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), AMED and Scopus were searched for articles describing observational or interventional studies. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database were searched for grey literature. Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts for potentially relevant articles. We included articles describing studies that had evaluated the development or application of technology to facilitate goal setting in rehabilitation for adults. Articles were excluded if the technology described did not include features to facilitate goal setting or were not in English. Narrative reviews, opinion pieces and editorials were also excluded.

Results: After screening 1640 publications of potential interest, we identified 27 studies for inclusion. These 27 articles described studies involving a total of 16 different technologies including, seven mobile apps, three websites, two mobile apps/website hybrids, two apps and two websites connected to a pedometer. We found that most technologies described were designed to facilitate self-management with goal setting as a feature and that only five included a shared decision moment around goal setting. Only six of the 16 technologies had research providing evidence of effectiveness in terms of improved patient outcomes, with the best evidence of beneficial effects associated with technologies that linked goal setting to pedometer use.

Conclusions: The identified technologies for use in adult rehabilitation that included goal setting as a feature were largely accepted and valued by patients and health professionals. The limited data suggest that there is a need for further research; specific foci may include the impact of incorporation of a shared decision-making moment and evaluation of effectiveness on patient outcomes.

Keywords: health informatics; information technology; rehabilitation medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for scoping reviews flow diagram for article selection.

References

    1. Siegert RJ, Levack WMM. Rehabilitation goal setting: theory, practice and evidence. CRC press, 2014.
    1. Barnes M, Ward AB. Textbook of rehabilitation medicine. Oxford, USA: University Press, 2000.
    1. Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1411–22. 10.1080/09638280400000237 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith JC, et al. . Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit in adult rehabilitation: summary of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2016;52:400–16. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization WHO/CONRAD technical consultation on nonoxynol-9, world Health organization, Geneva, 9-10 October 2001: summary report. Reprod Health Matters 2002;10:175–81. 10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00085-X - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources