Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;17(12):679-690.
doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00384-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer

Lamont J Wilkins et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease that lacks clear consensus on its ideal management. Historically, non-surgical treatment was the preferred strategy, and several studies demonstrated improved survival among men with high-risk disease managed with the combination of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared with ADT alone. However, practice trends in the past 10-15 years have shown increased use of radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for primary management of high-risk, localized disease. Radical prostatectomy, as a primary monotherapy, offers the potential benefits of avoiding ADT, reducing rates of symptomatic local recurrence, enabling full pathological tumour staging and potentially reducing late adverse effects such as secondary malignancy compared with radiation therapy. Retrospective studies have reported wide variability in short-term (pathological) and long-term (oncological) outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Surgical monotherapy continues to be appropriate for selected patients, whereas in others the best treatment strategy probably involves a multimodal approach. Appropriate risk stratification utilizing clinical, pathological and potentially also genomic risk data is imperative in the initial management of men with prostate cancer. However, data from ongoing and planned prospective trials are needed to identify the optimal management strategy for men with high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reese, A. C., Pierorazio, P. M., Han, M. & Partin, A. W. Contemporary evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk classification system. Urology 80, 1075–1079 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Hall, M. D., Schultheiss, T. E., Farino, G. & Wong, J. Y. C. Increase in higher risk prostate cancer cases following new screening recommendation by the US preventive services task force (USPSTF). J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 143–143 (2015).
    1. Mahal, B. A. et al. Use of active surveillance or watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer and management trends across risk groups in the United States, 2010–2015. JAMA 321, 704–706 (2019). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tosoian, J. J. et al. Active surveillance of grade group 1 prostate cancer: long-term outcomes from a large prospective cohort. Eur. Urol. 77, 675–682 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Klotz, L. et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 272–277 (2015). - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources