Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e3161.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003161. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Affiliations

Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Stephanie W Holzmer et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Gynecomastia is a graded condition characterized by enlargement of the male breast that affects a significant proportion of the male population. A plethora of varying surgical approaches currently exists in the literature; thus this comprehensive review sought to analyze surgical practice patterns and trends as they pertain to gynecomastia grade and severity. The current literature was queried utilizing the PubMed and MEDLINE databases-based on predefined parameters and individual review, 17 studies were ultimately included. Key data points included gynecomastia grade, surgical intervention, rate of complication, including hematoma, seroma, infection, and necrosis, and drain use. Two-sample t test was utilized for further analysis. A total of 1112 patients underwent surgical treatment for gynecomastia. Skin-sparing mastectomy with or without liposuction was the most frequently used procedure followed by mastectomy with skin reduction. Major complication rates ranged from 0% to 33%, with hematoma formation being most common (5.8%) followed seroma (2.4%). There was a higher rate of hematoma/seroma formation among authors who routinely utilized drain placement (9.78% versus 8.36%; P = 0.0051); however, this is likely attributable to the large discrepancy in percentage of grade III patients found in each group (50.23% versus 4.36%; P = 0.0000). As a wide variety of surgical techniques exist for the treatment of gynecomastia, an individualized approach based upon gynecomastia grade and patient preference may assist the surgeon in providing optimal outcomes. This senior author's preferred method for treatment of gynecomastia is illustrated in the included algorithm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
–The proposed algorithm for surgical management of gynecomastia based on the Simon grade.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown RH, Chang DK, Siy R, et al. Trends in the surgical correction of gynecomastia. Semin Plast Surg. 2015;29:122–130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fagerlund A, Lewin R, Rufolo G, et al. Gynecomastia: a systematic review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015;49:311–318. - PubMed
    1. Kim DH, Byun IH, Lee WJ, et al. Surgical management of gynecomastia: subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40:877–884. - PubMed
    1. Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A. Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:638e–648e. - PubMed
    1. Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, et al. Management of gynecomastia in patients with different body types: considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:492–496. - PMC - PubMed