Perceptions of Preparedness in Plastic Surgery Residency Training
- PMID: 33173679
- PMCID: PMC7647638
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003163
Perceptions of Preparedness in Plastic Surgery Residency Training
Abstract
Background: Graduating competent surgical residents requires progressive independence during training. Recent studies in other surgical subspecialties have demonstrated overall fewer opportunities for resident independence due to changes in residency regulations, medical-legal concerns, and financial incentives. A survey study was conducted to assess perceived autonomy and preparedness during plastic surgery residency training and to assess factors affecting autonomy.
Methods: Anonymous electronic surveys were sent to attending surgeons and residents of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited programs during the 2017-2018 academic year. Seventy-two integrated and 42 independent plastic surgery programs were surveyed. Analysis of responses was performed using the Fisher exact and chi-square tests.
Results: There were 158 attending surgeon and 129 resident responses. The resident and attending surgeon response rates were 11.7% and 16.8%, respectively. Eighty-seven percent of residents felt their operative experience within residency prepared them for practice. Residents felt least prepared in aesthetics and pediatrics/craniofacial surgery. Attending surgeons perceived that they provided residents graduated autonomy throughout residency. Residents identified the complexity of a procedure, attending surgeon supervision, and time constraints as the largest factors influencing resident autonomy. Attending surgeons noted patient safety as the largest deterrent to autonomy.
Conclusions: In our study, a majority of plastic surgery residents were found to feel prepared for practice after residency; however, preparedness gaps within training still exist in aesthetic and craniomaxillofacial surgery. Plastic surgery programs must work to develop training programs that simultaneously promote resident autonomy, while prioritizing patient safety, and maintaining productivity and financial well-being.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. This study was deemed exempt by institutional board review.
Figures
References
-
- Lewis FR, Klingensmith ME. Issues in general surgery residency training–2012. Ann Surg. 2012;256:553–559. - PubMed
-
- Kempenich JW, Willis RE, Rakosi R, et al. How do perceptions of autonomy differ in general surgery training between faculty, senior residents, hospital administrators, and the general public? A multi-institutional study. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:e193–e201. - PubMed
-
- Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, et al. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013;258:440–449. - PubMed
-
- Patel M, Bhullar JS, Subhas G, et al. Present status of autonomy in surgical residency–a program director’s perspective. Am Surg. 2015;81:786–790. - PubMed
-
- Meyerson SL, Teitelbaum EN, George BC, et al. Defining the autonomy gap: When expectations do not meet reality in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:e64–e72. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources