This is a preprint.
Social innovation research checklist: A crowdsourcing open call and digital hackathon to develop a checklist for research to advance social innovation in health
- PMID: 33173931
- PMCID: PMC7654927
- DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.03.20225110
Social innovation research checklist: A crowdsourcing open call and digital hackathon to develop a checklist for research to advance social innovation in health
Update in
-
Social Innovation For Health Research: Development of the SIFHR Checklist.PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 13;18(9):e1003788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788. eCollection 2021 Sep. PLoS Med. 2021. PMID: 34516565 Free PMC article. Review.
Abstract
While social innovations in health have shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), more research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovations. Research checklists can standardize and improve reporting of research findings, promote transparency, and increase replicability of study results and findings. This article describes the development of a 17-item social innovation in health research checklist to assess and report social innovation projects and provides examples of good reporting. The checklist is adapted from the TIDieR checklist and will facilitate more complete and transparent reporting and increase end user engagement.
Summary points: While many social innovations have been developed and shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, more research is needed to evaluate social innovationThe Social Innovation in Health Research Checklist, the first of its kind, is a 17-item checklist to improve reporting completeness and promote transparency in the development, implementation, and evaluation of social innovations in healthThe research checklist was developed through a three-step process, including a global open call for ideas, a scoping review, and a three-round modified Delphi processUse of this research checklist will enable researchers, innovators and partners to learn more about the process and results of social innovation in health research.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Halpaap BM, Tucker JD, Mathanga D, Juban N, Awor P, Saravia NG, et al. Social innovation in global health: sparking location action [Internet]. Vol. 8, The Lancet Global Health. Elsevier Ltd; 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 14]. p. e633–4. Available from: www.thelancet.com/lancetgh - PubMed
-
- Bazzano AN, Yan SD, Martin J, Mulhern E, Brown E, Lafond A, et al. Improving the reporting of health research involving design: A proposed guideline [Internet]. Vol. 5, BMJ Global Health. BMJ Publishing Group; 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 14]. p. 2248. Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/2/e002248 - PMC - PubMed
-
- O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Acad Med [Internet]. 2014. Sep [cited 2020 Aug 14];89(9):1245–51. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00001888-201409000-00021 - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous