Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2020 Nov 4:2020.11.03.20225110.
doi: 10.1101/2020.11.03.20225110.

Social innovation research checklist: A crowdsourcing open call and digital hackathon to develop a checklist for research to advance social innovation in health

Affiliations

Social innovation research checklist: A crowdsourcing open call and digital hackathon to develop a checklist for research to advance social innovation in health

Eneyi Kpokiri et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

  • Social Innovation For Health Research: Development of the SIFHR Checklist.
    Kpokiri EE, Chen E, Li J, Payne S, Shrestha P, Afsana K, Amazigo U, Awor P, de Lavison JF, Khan S, Mier-Alpaño J, Ong A Jr, Subhedar S, Wachmuth I, Cuervo LG, Mehta KM, Halpaap B, Tucker JD. Kpokiri EE, et al. PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 13;18(9):e1003788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788. eCollection 2021 Sep. PLoS Med. 2021. PMID: 34516565 Free PMC article. Review.

Abstract

While social innovations in health have shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), more research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovations. Research checklists can standardize and improve reporting of research findings, promote transparency, and increase replicability of study results and findings. This article describes the development of a 17-item social innovation in health research checklist to assess and report social innovation projects and provides examples of good reporting. The checklist is adapted from the TIDieR checklist and will facilitate more complete and transparent reporting and increase end user engagement.

Summary points: While many social innovations have been developed and shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, more research is needed to evaluate social innovationThe Social Innovation in Health Research Checklist, the first of its kind, is a 17-item checklist to improve reporting completeness and promote transparency in the development, implementation, and evaluation of social innovations in healthThe research checklist was developed through a three-step process, including a global open call for ideas, a scoping review, and a three-round modified Delphi processUse of this research checklist will enable researchers, innovators and partners to learn more about the process and results of social innovation in health research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Halpaap BM, Tucker JD, Mathanga D, Juban N, Awor P, Saravia NG, et al. Social innovation in global health: sparking location action [Internet]. Vol. 8, The Lancet Global Health. Elsevier Ltd; 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 14]. p. e633–4. Available from: www.thelancet.com/lancetgh - PubMed
    1. Castro-Arroyave D, Monroy MC, Irurita MI. Integrated vector control of Chagas disease in Guatemala: a case of social innovation in health. [cited 2020 Aug 18]; Available from: 10.1186/s40249-020-00639-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang F, Zhang TP, Tang W, Ong JJ, Alexander M, Forastiere L, et al. Pay-it-forward gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. Aug 1;20(8):976–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bazzano AN, Yan SD, Martin J, Mulhern E, Brown E, Lafond A, et al. Improving the reporting of health research involving design: A proposed guideline [Internet]. Vol. 5, BMJ Global Health. BMJ Publishing Group; 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 14]. p. 2248. Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/2/e002248 - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Acad Med [Internet]. 2014. Sep [cited 2020 Aug 14];89(9):1245–51. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00001888-201409000-00021 - PubMed

Publication types