Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;73(3):1131-1146.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00915-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art

Affiliations
Review

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art

Gabriele Materazzi et al. Updates Surg. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is worldwide considered the gold standard technique. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches have proved their efficacy with excellent outcomes. Since the introduction of da Vinci System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), robotic surgery has made many steps forward gaining progressively more diffusion in the field of general and endocrine surgery. The robotic technique offers advantages to overcome some laparoscopic shortcomings (rigid instruments, loss of 3D vision, unstable camera). Indeed, the robotic system is provided of stereoscopic 3D-magnified vision, additional degree of freedom, tremor-filtering technology and a stable camera. Recently, several case series have demonstrated the feasibility and the safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy in high-volume centers with outcomes comparable to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Notwithstanding, the technical advantages of the robotic system have not yet demonstrated significant improvements in terms of outcomes to undermine laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Moreover, robotic adrenalectomy harbor inherits drawbacks, such as longer operative time and elevated costs, that limit its use. In particular, the high cost associated with the use of the robotic system is primarily related to the purchase and the maintenance of the unit, the high instruments cost and the longer operative time. Notably, these aspects make robotic adrenalectomy up to 2.3 times more costly than laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This literature review summarizes the current available studies and provides an overview about the robotic scenario including applicability, technical details and surgical outcomes.

Keywords: Adrenal gland; Adrenalectomy; Laparoscopic; Retroperitoneal; Robotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolté E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(14):1033. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210013271417. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsuru N, Suzuki K, Ushiyama T, Ozono S. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal tumors. J Endourol. 2005;19(5):537–540. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.537. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Telem DA, Nguyen SQ, Chin EH, Weber K, Divino CM. Laparoscopic resection of giant adrenal cavernous hemangioma. JSLS. 2009;13(2):260–262. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heger P, Probst P, Hüttner FJ, Gooßen K, Proctor T, Müller-Stich BP, Strobel O, Büchler MW, Diener MK. Evaluation of open and minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a systematic review and networkmeta-analysis. World J Surg. 2017;41(11):2746–2757. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4095-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hu X, Yang WX, Shao YX, Dou WC, Xiong SC, Li X. Minimally invasive versus open adrenalectomy in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08454-1. - DOI - PubMed