Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):757-768.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33310. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Patient-reported causes of distress predict disparities in time to evaluation and time to treatment after breast cancer diagnosis

Affiliations

Patient-reported causes of distress predict disparities in time to evaluation and time to treatment after breast cancer diagnosis

Oluwadamilola M Fayanju et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: We examined whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (DT), a patient-reported outcome measure, could be used to identify levels and causes of distress associated with racial/ethnic disparities in time to care among patients with breast cancer.

Methods: We identified women aged ≥18 years with stage 0-IV breast cancer who were diagnosed in a single health system between January 2014 and July 2016. The baseline visit was defined as the first postdiagnosis, pretreatment clinical evaluation. Zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression (modeling non-zero DT scores and DT scores = 0) and logistic regression (modeling DT score ≥ 4, threshold for social services referral) were used to examine associations between baseline score (0 = none to 10 = extreme) and types of stressors (emotional, familial, practical, physical, spiritual) after adjustment for race/ethnicity and other characteristics. Linear regression with log transformation was used to identify predictors of time to evaluation and time to treatment.

Results: A total of 1029 women were included (median baseline DT score = 4). Emotional, physical, and practical stressors were associated with distress in both the ZINB and logistic models (all P < .05). Black patients (n = 258) were more likely to report no distress than Whites (n = 675; ZINB zero model odds ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68-4.40; P < .001) despite reporting a similar number of stressors (P = .07). Higher DT scores were associated with shorter time to evaluation and time to treatment while being Black and having physical or practical stressors were associated with delays in both (all P < .05).

Conclusions: Patient-reported stressors predicted delays in time to care, but patient-reported levels of distress did not, with Black patients having delayed time to care despite reporting low levels of distress. We describe anticipatory, culturally responsive strategies for using patient-reported outcomes to address observed disparities.

Keywords: breast cancer; distress; health disparities; modifiable risk factors; patient-reported outcomes; race/ethnicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

The authors made no disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2014 and July 2016. DT, distress thermometer; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Levels and causes of patient-reported distress among patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2014 and July 2016 (n = 1029). DT, distress thermometer; IQR, interquartile range; PI, Pacific Islander. *Statistically significant difference between racial/ethnic groups.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Frequency of patient-reported stressors among patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2014 and July 2016 (n = 1029). (A) All patients. (B) Asian/PI patients. (C) Black patients. (D) Hispanic patients. (E) White patients. (F) Patients of other races/ethnicities. PI, Pacific Islander.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Frequency of patient-reported stressors among patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2014 and July 2016 (n = 1029). (A) All patients. (B) Asian/PI patients. (C) Black patients. (D) Hispanic patients. (E) White patients. (F) Patients of other races/ethnicities. PI, Pacific Islander.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Frequency of patient-reported stressors among patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2014 and July 2016 (n = 1029). (A) All patients. (B) Asian/PI patients. (C) Black patients. (D) Hispanic patients. (E) White patients. (F) Patients of other races/ethnicities. PI, Pacific Islander.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: distress management, version 2.2019. Accessed 20 May 2019 http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/distress.pdf - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gessler S, Low J, Daniells E, et al. Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psycho-Oncology. 2008;17:538–547. - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, et al. Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005; 103: 1494–1502. - PubMed
    1. Fayanju OM, Yenokyan K, Ren Y, et al. The effect of treatment on patient-reported distress after breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer. 2019;125:3040–3049. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Time to surgery and breast cancer survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:330–339. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types