An ethnographic study of the interaction between philosophy of childbirth and place of birth
- PMID: 33176996
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.008
An ethnographic study of the interaction between philosophy of childbirth and place of birth
Abstract
Background: Organisational culture and place of birth have an impact on the variation in birth outcomes seen in different settings.
Aim: To explore how childbirth is constructed and influenced by context in three birth settings in Australia.
Method: This ethnographic study included observations of 25 healthy women giving birth in three settings: home (9), two birth centres (10), two obstetric units (9). Individual interviews were undertaken with these women at 6-8 weeks after birth and focus groups were conducted with 37 midwives working in the three settings: homebirth (11), birth centres (10) and obstetric units (16).
Results: All home birth participants adopted a forward leaning position for birth and no vaginal examinations occurred. In contrast, all women in the obstetric unit gave birth on a bed with at least one vaginal examination. One summary concept emerged, Philosophy of childbirth and place of birth as synergistic mechanisms of effect. This was enacted in practice through 'running the gauntlet', based on the following synthesis: For women and midwives, depending on their childbirth philosophy, place of birth is a stimulus for, or a protection from, running the gauntlet of the technocratic approach to birth. The birth centres provided an intermediate space where the complex interplay of factors influencing acceptance of, or resistance to the gauntlet were most evident.
Conclusions: A complex interaction exists between prevailing childbirth philosophies of women and midwives and the birth environment. Behaviours that optimise physiological birth were associated with increasing philosophical, and physical, distance from technocratic childbirth norms.
Keywords: Birth centre; Birth culture; Birth environment; Birth position; Childbirth philosophy; Home birth.
Copyright © 2020 Australian College of Midwives. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Midwifery. 2013. PMID: 23415360
-
From hospital to home: Australian midwives' experiences of transitioning into publicly-funded homebirth programs.Women Birth. 2017 Feb;30(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 1. Women Birth. 2017. PMID: 27594344
-
"A powerful midwifery vision": Dutch student midwives' educational needs as advocates of physiological childbirth.Women Birth. 2019 Dec;32(6):e576-e583. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Women Birth. 2019. PMID: 30611729
-
Women׳s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: An exploration of the literature on 'birthing outside the system'.Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 19. Midwifery. 2016. PMID: 27055760 Review.
-
Place and space in relation to childbirth: a critical interpretive synthesis.Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020 Dec;15(sup1):1667143. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1667143. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020. PMID: 33103631 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04410-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35152880 Free PMC article.
-
Being in the zone during physiological birth: a comparative study of hospital and home birth environments.Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Apr 15;6:1573688. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1573688. eCollection 2025. Front Glob Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40303988 Free PMC article.
-
Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 4;3(3):CD010088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35244935 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources