Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e386-e392.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004550. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

Worldwide Techniques and Outcomes in Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Results From the Multicenter International Registry

B Feike Kingma  1 , Peter P Grimminger  2 , Pieter C van der Sluis  1   2 , Marc J van Det  3 , Ewout A Kouwenhoven  3 , Yin-Kai Chao  4 , Chun-Yi Tsai  4 , Hans F Fuchs  5 , Christiane J Bruns  5 , Inderpal S Sarkaria  6 , James D Luketich  6 , Jan W Haveman  7 , Boudewijn van Etten  7 , Philip W Chiu  8 , Shannon M Chan  8 , Philippe Rouanet  9 , Anne Mourregot  9 , Jens-Peter Hölzen  10 , Rubens A Sallum  11 , Ivan Cecconello  11 , Jan-Hendrik Egberts  12 , Frank Benedix  13 , Mark I van Berge Henegouwen  14 , Suzanne S Gisbertz  14 , Daniel Perez  15 , Kristina Jansen  15 , Michal Hubka  16 , Donald E Low  16 , Matthias Biebl  17 , Johann Pratschke  17 , Paul Turner  18 , Kish Pursnani  18 , Asif Chaudry  19 , Myles Smith  19 , Elena Mazza  20 , Paolo Strignano  20 , Jelle P Ruurda  1 , Richard van Hillegersberg  1 ; UGIRA Study Group
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Worldwide Techniques and Outcomes in Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Results From the Multicenter International Registry

B Feike Kingma et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: This international multicenter study by the Upper GI International Robotic Association aimed to gain insight in current techniques and outcomes of RAMIE worldwide.

Background: Current evidence for RAMIE originates from single-center studies, which may not be generalizable to the international multicenter experience.

Methods: Twenty centers from Europe, Asia, North-America, and South-America participated from 2016 to 2019. Main endpoints included the surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and early oncological results of ramie.

Results: A total of 856 patients undergoing transthoracic RAMIE were included. Robotic surgery was applied for both the thoracic and abdominal phase (45%), only the thoracic phase (49%), or only the abdominal phase (6%). In most cases, the mediastinal lymphadenectomy included the low paraesophageal nodes (n=815, 95%), subcarinal nodes (n = 774, 90%), and paratracheal nodes (n = 537, 63%). When paratracheal lymphadenectomy was performed during an Ivor Lewis or a McKeown RAMIE procedure, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred in 3% and 11% of patients, respectively. Circular stapled (52%), hand-sewn (30%), and linear stapled (18%) anastomotic techniques were used. In Ivor Lewis RAMIE, robot-assisted hand-sewing showed the highest anastomotic leakage rate (33%), while lower rates were observed with circular stapling (17%) and linear stapling (15%). In McKeown RAMIE, a hand-sewn anastomotic technique showed the highest leakage rate (27%), followed by linear stapling (18%) and circular stapling (6%).

Conclusion: This study is the first to provide an overview of the current techniques and outcomes of transthoracic RAMIE worldwide. Although these results indicate high quality of the procedure, the optimal approach should be further defined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(suppl 3):S1350–S1356.
    1. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–1098.
    1. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–1669.
    1. Haverkamp L, Seesing MF, Ruurda JP, et al. Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–7.
    1. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multi-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–1892.

Publication types