Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 4:13:1003-1009.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S261433. eCollection 2020.

Thyroid Dysfunctions Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Thyroid Dysfunctions Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review

Rawaa El Sabbagh et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are anti-cancer drugs associated with adverse events that result from releasing the immune system against self-antigens while attacking cancer cells. Thyroid dysfunctions are among the most common associated adverse events.

Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature in 2 databases: PubMed and Medline. Articles that reported thyroid adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors were reviewed. Thyroid disorders include hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism and are most commonly seen with programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors.

Conclusions: Thyroid disorders are common side effects seen with check point inhibitors and are treated, depending on the clinical situation, by adequate hormonal replacement, thionamides, corticosteroids or observation only. The use of high dose corticosteroids has not been established as a treatment of thyroid toxicities. Thyroid function tests screening should be a part of baseline laboratory testing of all patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Keywords: anti-PD1; anti-PDL1; immune check point inhibitors; thyroid dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CTLA-4 pathway: (A) T cell activation in response to the tumor-associated antigen requires 2 signals. The first signal is achieved when the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surface of the antigen-presenting cell (APC) recognizes the T-cell receptor (TCR) of the T cell. The second signal is the binding of CD80/86 (also known as B7) on the APC cell with the CD28 receptor on the T cell. This will lead to the activation of the immune response against the tumor cells. (B) CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4), a homolog of CD28, is a checkpoint present on T cells that limits proliferative response of activated T-cell by competing with CD28 for its ligand CD80/86. This inhibition will interrupt the second signal. (C) Monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4 block CTLA-4 and will lead to T- cell activation and proliferation against the tumor cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PD-1- PD-L1 pathway: (A) PD-1 is a checkpoint present on the surface of T cells. When PD-1 binds to its ligands, PD-L1/2 present on APC and cancer cells, this will result in the inhibition of T cell activity in favour of tumor survival. (B) Monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 or PDL-1/2 will lead to the activation of the immune response against the tumor cells.

References

    1. Kreamer KM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a new paradigm in treating advanced cancer. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014;5:418–431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:252–264. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF. Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):711–723. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1003466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber JS, D’Angelo SP, Minor D. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):375–384. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–2532. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503093 - DOI - PubMed