Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 22:977:75-100.
doi: 10.3897/zookeys.977.57875. eCollection 2020.

Taxonomic notes on the genus Campiglossa Rondani (Diptera, Tephritidae, Tephritinae, Tephritini) in India, with description of three new species

Affiliations

Taxonomic notes on the genus Campiglossa Rondani (Diptera, Tephritidae, Tephritinae, Tephritini) in India, with description of three new species

Karamankodu Jacob David et al. Zookeys. .

Abstract

Three new species of Campiglossa Rondani are described from India: adults of both sexes and third instar larvae of C. ialong David, Salini & Hancock, sp. nov. and C. sherlyae David & Hancock, sp. nov., plus an adult female of C. shaktii David, Sachin & Hancock, sp. nov., are described and illustrated. Postabdominal structures, cephalopharyngeal skeleton, and anterior and posterior spiracles of C. gemma (Hering, 1939) and C. sororcula (Wiedemann, 1830) are illustrated. DNA barcode sequences of C. ialong sp. nov., C. sherlyae sp. nov., and C. gemma were obtained and reported. Records of C. absinthii (Fabricius, 1805) and C. iracunda (Hering, 1938) are regarded as misidentifications of C. lyncea (Bezzi, 1913) and C. shaktii sp. nov., respectively, and excluded from the Indian fauna. A key to the known species of Campiglossa from India is provided. Results of preliminary phylogenetic analysis using COI revealed that C. ialong sp. nov. is paraphyletic to the Campiglossa misella group and C. C. sherlyae sp. nov. is a sister species of C. deserta.

Keywords: Asteraceae; Conyza; Dioxyna; Sonchus; Western Ghats; northeast India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Habitus (male) of Campiglossa ialong David, Salini & Hancock, sp. nov.
Figures 2–9.
Figures 2–9.
Campiglossa ialong David, Salini & Hancock, sp. nov. 2 head 3 thorax (dorsal view) 4 thorax (lateral view) and legs 5 abdomen 6 wing 7 epandrium and surstyli (lateral view) 8 epandrium and surstyli (posterior view) 9 glans of phallus.
Figures 10, 11.
Figures 10, 11.
Campiglossa ialong David, Salini & Hancock, sp. nov. 10 spermatheca 11 ovipositor 11a spicules on proximal end of eversible membrane 11b spicules on distal end of eversible membrane 11c aculeus tip.
Figures 12–14.
Figures 12–14.
Larval morphology of Campiglossa ialong David, Salini & Hancock, sp. nov. 12 cephalopharyngeal skeleton 13 anterior spiracle 14 posterior spiracles.
Figures 15–19.
Figures 15–19.
Campiglossa shaktii David, Sachin & Hancock, sp. nov. 15 head 16 thorax (dorsal view) 17 abdomen 18 thorax (lateral view) and legs 19 wing.
Figures 20–22.
Figures 20–22.
Campiglossa shaktii David, Sachin & Hancock, sp. nov. 20 spermatheca 21 ovipositor 21a spicules on proximal end 21b spicules on distal end of eversible membrane 22 aculeus 22a aculeus tip.
Figure 23.
Figure 23.
Campiglossa sherlyae David & Hancock, sp. nov. 23a habitus (dorsal) 23b habitus (lateral) 23c wing.
Figures 24–28.
Figures 24–28.
Campiglossa sherlyae David & Hancock, sp. nov. 24 spermatheca 25 ovipositor 25a spicules on proximal end of eversible membrane 25b spicules on distal end of eversible membrane 25c aculeus tip 26 epandrium and surstyli (lateral view) 27 epandrium and surstyli (posterior view) 28 glans of phallus.
Figures 29–31.
Figures 29–31.
III instar larva of Campiglossa sherlyae David & Hancock, sp.nov. (Hering) 29 cephalopharyngeal skeleton 30 anterior spiracle 31 posterior spiracles.
Figures 32–37.
Figures 32–37.
Campiglossa gemma (Hering) 32 habitus (dorsal view) 33 ovipositor 33a spicules on proximal end of eversible membrane 33b spicules on distal end of eversible membrane 33c aculeus tip 34 spermatheca 35 epandrium and surstyli (posterior view) 36 epandrium and surstyli (lateral view) 37 glans of phallus.
Figures 38–40.
Figures 38–40.
III instar larvae of Campiglossa gemma (Hering) 38 cephalopharyngeal skeleton 39 anterior spiracle 40 posterior spiracles.
Figures 41–47.
Figures 41–47.
Campiglossa sororcula (Wiedemann) 41 habitus (lateral) 42 epandrium (lateral view) 43 epandrium (posterior view) 44 glans of phallus 45 ovipositor 45a spicules on proximal end of eversible membrane 45b spicules on distal end of eversible membrane 46 aculeus 47 spermatheca.
Figures 48–50.
Figures 48–50.
Third instar larva of Campiglossa sororcula (Wiedemann) 48 cephalopharyngeal skeleton 49 anterior spiracle 50 posterior spiracles.
Figure 51.
Figure 51.
Maximum likelihood phylogram of 17 Campiglossa and one Tephritis (outgroup) DNA barcode sequences using General Time Reversible model. The number at each node is the boostsrap value based on ML analysis.

References

    1. Agarwal ML, Grewal JS, Kapoor VC, Gupta SK, Sharma SK. (1989) Three new species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) from India. Journal of Insect Science 2(2): 88–94.
    1. Agarwal ML, Sueyoshi M. (2005) Catalogue of Indian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oriental Insects 39: 371–433. 10.1080/00305316.2005.10417450 - DOI
    1. Ball SL, Armstrong KF. (2008) Rapid, one-step DNA extraction for insect pest identification by using DNA barcodes. Journal of Economic Entomology 101: 523–532. 10.1093/jee/101.2.523 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bezzi M. (1913) Indian trypaneids (fruit-flies) in the collection of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Memoirs of the Indian Museum 3: 53–175.
    1. Felsenstein J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x - DOI - PubMed