Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 27;9(1):1832348.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1832348.

Baseline plasma levels of soluble PD-1, PD-L1, and BTN3A1 predict response to nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a step toward a biomarker for therapeutic decisions

Affiliations

Baseline plasma levels of soluble PD-1, PD-L1, and BTN3A1 predict response to nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a step toward a biomarker for therapeutic decisions

Lorena Incorvaia et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

Despite a proportion of renal cancer patients can experiment marked and durable responses to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, the treatment efficacy is widely variable and identifying the patient who will benefit from immunotherapy remains an issue. We performed a prospective study to investigate if soluble forms of the immune-checkpoints PD-1 (sPD-1), PD-L1 (sPD-L1), pan-BTN3As, BTN3A1, and BTN2A1, could be candidate to predict the response to immune-checkpoint blockade therapy. We evaluated the plasma levels in a learning cohort of metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) patients treated with the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab by ad hoc developed ELISA's. Using specific cut-offs determined through ROC curves, we showed that high baseline levels of sPD-1 (>2.11 ng/ml), sPD-L1 (>0.66 ng/ml), and sBTN3A1 (>6.84 ng/ml) were associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS) to nivolumab treatment [median PFS, levels above thresholds: sPD-1, 20.7 months (p < .0001); sPD-L1, 19 months (p < .0001); sBTN3A1, 17.5 months (p = .002)]. High sPD-1 and sBTN3A1 levels were also associated with best overall response by RECIST and objective response of >20%. The results were confirmed in a validation cohort of 20 mccRCC patients. The analysis of plasma dynamic changes after nivolumab showed a statistically significant decrease of sPD-1 after 2 cycles (Day 28) in the long-responder patients. Our study revealed that the plasma levels of sPD-1, sPD-L1, and sBTN3A1 can predict response to nivolumab, discriminating responders from non-responders already at therapy baseline, with the advantages of non-invasive sample collection and real-time monitoring that allow to evaluate the dynamic changes during cancer evolution and treatment.

Keywords: BTN2A1; BTN3A1; PD-1; PD-L1; butyrophilins; circulating immune checkpoints; immunotherapy response; predictive biomarker; renal cell carcinoma; soluble immune-checkpoints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The assessment of PD-L1 expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples shows several limitations inherent to the tissue sampling, IHC detection methods and used antibodies. Circulating ICs could represent more dynamic biomarkers and be useful to predict the effect of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody against RCC
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PFS (months) to nivolumab treatment in mccRCC patients (a); mean value of plasmatic ICs levels in all nivolumab patients versus long-responders patients (>18 months) (b, c–f)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression free survival in patients from learning cohort with high and low plasma levels of sPD-1 (a), sPD-L1 (b), and sBTN3A1 (c)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison T0-T1 of ICs levels in the plasma of mccRCC long responders patients treated with nivolumab
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
ICs in RCC patients: localized vs metastatic disease at baseline (pretreatment)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Inamura K. Renal Cell Tumors: understanding Their Molecular Pathological Epidemiology and the 2016 WHO Classification. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2195. doi:10.3390/ijms18102195. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsieh JJ, Le V, Cao D, Cheng EH, Creighton CJ. Genomic classifications of renal cell carcinoma: a critical step towards the future application of personalized kidney cancer care with pan-omics precision. J Pathol. 2018;244(5):525–11. doi:10.1002/path.5022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dutcher JP. Update on the biology and management of renal cell carcinoma. J Invest Med. 2019;67(1):1–10. doi:10.1136/jim-2018-000918. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Incorvaia L, Bronte G, Bazan V, Badalamenti G, Rizzo S, Pantuso G, Natoli C, Russo A. Beyond evidence-based data: scientific rationale and tumor behavior to drive sequential and personalized therapeutic strategies for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(16):21259–21271. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins MB, Tannir NM. Current and emerging therapies for first-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;70:127–137. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.07.009. - DOI - PubMed