Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 16:7:540929.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.540929. eCollection 2020.

One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Fistulizing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: An Effective Strategy

Affiliations

One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Fistulizing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: An Effective Strategy

Simon Marmor et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Prosthetic hip infection (PHI) is a disastrous scenario after an arthroplasty. International guidelines contraindicate one-stage exchange arthroplasty for fistulizing chronic prosthetic hip infection (FCPHI), nevertheless few surgical teams, mostly from Europe, support one stage procedure for this indication. Questions/Purposes: Analysis of infection recurrence and implant failure of a series of FCPHIs treated with one stage arthroplasty. Patients and Methods: Sixty-six FCPHIs treated with one-stage exchange arthroplasty were prospectively followed up at least 2 years. Clinical, radiological and bacteriological signs suggestive of reinfection were sought, as well as implant failures and PHI related deaths. Results: Thirty-four females and thirty-two males with median age of 69.5 years [61-77] and BMI of 26 kg/m2 [22-31] were included. Fistulae were productive in 50 patients (76%). Staphylococcus was responsible for 45% of PHI and 21% were polymicrobial. Twenty-nine patients (44%) received preoperative antibiotic therapy. After a median 60-month follow-up [35-82], 3 patients (4.5%) presented reinfection (two new infections, one relapse) and 3 patients experienced implant failure (1 femoral fracture, 1 stem breakage, 1 recurrent dislocation). One death was related to PHI. After a minimum of 2 years, the infection control rate was of 95.3% (±0.02). Conclusion: One-stage exchange arthroplasty for FCPHIs showed a good infection control rate similar to that of non-fistulizing PHI. Systematic preoperative microbiological documentation with joint aspiration and, in some specific cases, the use of preoperative antibiotic therapy are among the optimizations accounting for the success of the one-stage arthroplasty. In light of these results, and those of other studies, international recommendations could evolve. Level of Evidence: Descriptive therapeutic prospective cohort study. Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: fistula; hip; infection; joint; one stage exchange arthroplasty; prostheses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Arthrography showing the fistula pathway.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Cumulative survival free of reinfection. (B) Cumulative implant failure-free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Svensson K, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Mohaddes M. Similar risk of re-revision in patients after one- or two-stage surgical revision of infected total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of revisions in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register 1979–2015. J Clin Med. (2019) 8:485. 10.3390/jcm8040485 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdelaziz H, Grüber H, Gehrke T, Salber J, Citak M. What are the factors associated with re-revision after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip? A case-control study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2019) 477:2258–63. 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000780 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zahar A., Klaber I, Gerken AM., Gehrke T, Gebauer M, et al. . Ten-year results following one-stage septic hip exchange in the management of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. (2019) 34:1221–6. 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernand N, Foguet P, Mont MA, Sodhi N, Molloy R, Saldaña R. What are the potential advantages of a one-stage exchange arthroplasty? International consensus meeting (icm) on orthopaedic infections. (2018). Available online at: https://icmphilly.com/questions/what-are-the-potential-advantages-of-a-o... (accessed 2020).
    1. Wroblewski BM. One-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (1986) 211:103–7. 10.1097/00003086-198610000-00014 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources