Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242305.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242305. eCollection 2020.

Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Italy: The role of local and interventional factors in the control of the epidemic

Affiliations

Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Italy: The role of local and interventional factors in the control of the epidemic

Daniele Lilleri et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Containment measures have been applied in several countries in order to limit the diffusion of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. The scope of this study is to analyze the evolution of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic throughout Italy and factors associated to the different way it spread in the Italian Regions, starting from the day that the first indigenous cases were detected through day 81 (6 days after the end of the strict lockdown). Data were obtained from daily reports and are represented as number (and percentage) of cases/100,000 persons. A lockdown with movement restrictions, especially across Regions, was declared at day 20. At day 81, 219,070 cases (363/100,000 persons) were diagnosed. A regression analysis based on the Gompertz model predicts a total number 233,606 cases (386/100,000 persons) at the end of the epidemic. The 21 areas, divided into Italian Regions and autonomous Provinces, showed a wide range in the frequency of cases at day 81 (58-921, median 258/100,000 persons) and total predicted cases (58-946, median 267/100,000 persons). Similarly, the predicted time for the end of the wave of the epidemic (considering as surrogate marker the time at which 99% of the total cases are predicted to occur) was highly variable, ranging from 64 to 136 (median 99) days. We analyzed the impact of local and interventional variables on the epidemic curve in each Region. The number of cases correlated inversely with the distance from the area in which first cases were detected and directly also with the gross domestic product pro capite (as a marker of industrial activity) of the Region. Moreover, an earlier start of the lockdown (i.e. in the presence of a lower number of cases) and wider testing were associated with a lower final number of total cases. In conclusion, this analysis shows that population-wide testing and early lockdown enforcement appear effective in limiting the spreading of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Cumulative (A, B) and new daily (C, D) cases of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Italy. In A and B, white circles represent the actual cumulative cases and the black line the regression curve.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Determination of the regression curves at different time-points during the epidemic.
White circles represent actual cases.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Cumulative cases of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the Italian Regions (A). In panel (B) a magnification of the initial phase is shown.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correlation between the total number of cases and local or interventional variables.
Correlation between the total number of cases predicted and (A) the distance from the origin of the epidemic, (B) gross domestic product pro capite, (C) number of cases at lockdown (note that the x-axis is logarithmic) and (D) number of swabs tested per case detected.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Multiple linear regression analysis of local, interventional variables, and their combination vs the total number of cases.
The actual number of cases is reported on the x-axis and the number predicted by the regression lines are reported on the y-axis. Variables used in the three regression analyses are reported in Table 3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270–273. 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med. 2020;26(4):450–452. 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19: interim guidance, 7 March 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331422.
    1. Hale T, Angrist A, Cameron-Blake E, Hallas L, Kira B, Majumdar S, Petherick A, Phillips T, Tatlow H, Webster S. “Variation in Government Responses to COVID-19” Version 7.0. Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper. May 25, 2020. www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/covidtracker [cited October 8, 2020].
    1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 explorer. https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/covid/ [cited October 8 2020].

Publication types

MeSH terms