Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 9;8(4):668.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040668.

Epidemiological Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: Mathematical Modeling Analyses

Affiliations

Epidemiological Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: Mathematical Modeling Analyses

Monia Makhoul et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

This study aims to inform SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development/licensure/decision-making/implementation, using mathematical modeling, by determining key preferred vaccine product characteristics and associated population-level impacts of a vaccine eliciting long-term protection. A prophylactic vaccine with efficacy against acquisition (VES) ≥70% can eliminate the infection. A vaccine with VES <70% may still control the infection if it reduces infectiousness or infection duration among those vaccinated who acquire the infection, if it is supplemented with <20% reduction in contact rate, or if it is complemented with herd-immunity. At VES of 50%, the number of vaccinated persons needed to avert one infection is 2.4, and the number is 25.5 to avert one severe disease case, 33.2 to avert one critical disease case, and 65.1 to avert one death. The probability of a major outbreak is zero at VES ≥70% regardless of the number of virus introductions. However, an increase in social contact rate among those vaccinated (behavior compensation) can undermine vaccine impact. In addition to the reduction in infection acquisition, developers should assess the natural history and disease progression outcomes when evaluating vaccine impact.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; epidemiology; mathematical model; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on the number of (A) new infections, (B) new severe disease cases, (C) new critical disease cases, and (D) new deaths in the scenario assuming vaccine scale-up to 80% coverage before epidemic onset. The duration of vaccine protection is 10 years. Impact was assessed at VES=50%, VEI=50%, VEP1=50%, VEP2=50%, VES=VEI=VEP1=50%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on the number of (A) new infections, (B) new severe disease cases, (C) new critical disease cases, and (D) new deaths in the scenario assuming vaccine introduction during the exponential growth phase of the epidemic, with scale-up to 80% coverage within one month. Duration of vaccine protection is 10 years. Impact was assessed at VES=50%, VEI=50%, VEP1=50%, VEP2=50%, VES=VEI=VEP1=50%.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness. Number of vaccinated persons needed to avert (A) one infection, (B) one severe disease case, (C) one critical disease case, and (D) one death, by the end of the epidemic cycle, that is, after the epidemic has reached its peak and declined to a negligible level. The scenario assumes vaccine scale-up to 80% coverage before epidemic onset. Duration of vaccine protection is 10 years. Impact was assessed at VES=50%, VEI=50%, VEP1=50%, VEP2=50%, VES=VEI=VEP1=50%. Panel A does not include the result for VEP2=50%, as this efficacy has no impact on the number of infections—it affects only severe and critical disease and death.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effectiveness of age-group prioritization using a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with VEs of 50%. Number of vaccinated persons needed to avert (A) one infection, (B) one severe disease case, (C) one critical disease case, and (D) one death by prioritizing different age groups for vaccination. Scenario assumes vaccine scale-up to 80% coverage before epidemic onset and duration of vaccine protection of 10 years. Effectiveness is assessed at the end of the epidemic cycle, that is, after the epidemic has reached its peak and declined to a negligible level.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Impact of varying levels of vaccine efficacy in reducing susceptibility (VEs) on (A) cumulative number of new SARS-CoV-2 infections (final epidemic size) and (B) number of vaccinated persons needed to avert one SARS-CoV-2 infection. Scenario assumes vaccine scale-up to 80% coverage before epidemic onset. Duration of vaccine protection is 10 years. Measures are assessed at the end of the epidemic cycle, that is, after the epidemic has reached its peak and declined to a negligible level.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Impact of vaccination with reduced adherence to social distancing for those vaccinated. Figure shows the impact of varying levels of behavior compensation post-vaccination on the vaccine-induced reduction in the cumulative number of new SARS-CoV-2 infections by the end of the epidemic cycle. Scenario assumes vaccine scale-up to 80% coverage before epidemic onset, VEs is 50%, and duration of vaccine protection is 10 years.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Probability of occurrence of a major outbreak following vaccination. Probability of occurrence of a major outbreak upon virus introduction at varying levels of (A) VES, (B) VEI, (C) VEP1, and (D) VES=VEI=VEP1. Scenario assumes vaccine scale-up to 80% coverage before epidemic onset. Duration of vaccine protection is 10 years. The figure does not include the result for VEP2, as this efficacy has no impact on the probability of occurrence of a major outbreak. The analysis and derivation for the probability of occurrence of a major outbreak can be found in Text S1D of the Supplementary Material.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yang Y., Peng F., Wang R., Guan K., Jiang T., Xu G., Sun J., Chang C. The deadly coronaviruses: The 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China. J. Autoimmun. 2020:102434. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102434. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lauer S.A., Grantz K.H., Bi Q., Jones F.K., Zheng Q., Meredith H.R., Azman A.S., Reich N.G., Lessler J. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: Estimation and application. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020;172:577–582. doi: 10.7326/M20-0504. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [(accessed on 10 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mis....
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. [(accessed on 14 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-re....

LinkOut - more resources