Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul;24(5):803-812.
doi: 10.1111/ner.13319. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Concussion: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Concussion: A Systematic Review

Adriano Mollica et al. Neuromodulation. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Post-concussive symptoms (PCSs) are common, disabling, and challenging to manage. Evolving models of concussion pathophysiology suggest evidence of brain network dysfunction that may be amenable to neuromodulation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a potential novel treatment option for PCSs.

Objectives: To systematically review rTMS trials for the treatment of symptoms following concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review of Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO databases were searched up to May 19, 2020. Studies were included if they were prospective rTMS treatment studies of patients with mTBI/concussion. Variables including patient demographics, study design, rTMS protocol parameters, primary outcome measures, and efficacy data were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. rTMS methodology and study quality were also evaluated.

Results: Of the 342 studies identified, 11 met eligibility criteria and were included for synthesis. Forty-one percent of patients were female and age ranged from 18 to 65 (average age = 38.5 years). Post-concussive depression (seven studies) and headache (four studies) were the most commonly investigated symptoms. The majority of trials were sham-controlled with randomized control trial (RCT) designs, but all were small pilot samples (n < 30). Methodological heterogeneity and a low number of identified trials precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Regarding rTMS for post-concussive depression, positive results were found in two out of four studies with depression as a primary outcome, and all three studies that assessed depression as a secondary outcome. All four rTMS studies for post-concussive headache reported positive results.

Conclusions: rTMS for the treatment of concussion/mTBI shows promising preliminary results for post-concussive depression and headache, symptoms that otherwise have limited effective treatment options. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further establish potential efficacy.

Keywords: Concussion; depression; headache; mild traumatic brain injury; post-concussive syndrome; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation 2007;22:341-353. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2007-22502.
    1. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2018;130:1080-1097. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352.
    1. Voss JD, Connolly J, Schwab KA, Scher AI. Update on the epidemiology of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2015;19:32.
    1. Langer L, Levy C, Bayley M. Increasing incidence of concussion: true epidemic or better recognition? J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020;35:E60-E66. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000499.
    1. McMahon P, Hricik A, Yue JK et al. Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. JAMA Neurol 2014;31:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.2984.