Assessment of Prevalence of Cervical Facet Joint Pain with Diagnostic Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: Analysis Based on Chronic Pain Model
- PMID: 33185369
Assessment of Prevalence of Cervical Facet Joint Pain with Diagnostic Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: Analysis Based on Chronic Pain Model
Abstract
Background: Research into cervical spinal pain syndromes has indicated that the cervical facet joints can be a potent source of neck pain, headache, and referred pain into the upper extremities. There have been multiple diagnostic accuracy studies, most commonly utilizing diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks and an acute pain model, as Bogduk has proposed. Subsequently, Manchikanti has focused on the importance of the chronic pain model and longer lasting relief with diagnostic blocks.
Objective: To assess diagnostic accuracy of cervical facet joint nerve blocks with controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks, with updated assessment of prevalence, false-positive rate, and a description of philosophical paradigm shift from acute to chronic pain model, with concordant pain relief.
Study design: This diagnostic accuracy study was performed with retrospective assessment of data to assess prevalence and false-positive rates.
Setting: The study was performed in a non-university-based, multidisciplinary, interventional pain management, private practice in the United States.
Methods: Cervical medial branch blocks were performed utilizing lidocaine 1% followed by bupivacaine 0.25% when appropriate response was obtained in an operating room under fluoroscopic guidance with 0.5 mL of lidocaine or bupivacaine from C3-C6 medial branches (levels blocked on joints involved). If a patient failed to respond to lidocaine with appropriate >= 80% pain relief, that patient was considered as negative for facet joint pain. If the response was positive with lidocaine block, a bupivacaine block was performed.
Results: The chronic cervical facet joint pain was diagnosed with cervical facet joint nerve blocks at a prevalence of 49.3% (95% CI, 43.6%, 55.0%) and with a false-positive rate of 25.6% (95% CI, 19.5%, 32.8%). This study also showed a single block prevalence rate of 66.3% (95% CI, 71.7%, 60.9%). Assessment of the duration of relief with each block showed greater than 80% for 6 days with lidocaine block and total relief of >= 50% of 31 days. In contrast, with bupivacaine, average duration of pain relief of >= 80% was 12 days with a total relief of >= 50% lasting for 55 days.
Conclusion: Based on this investigation, utilizing a chronic pain model, there was significant difference in the relief patterns. This assessment showed prevalence and false-positive rates of 49.3% and 25.6% in chronic neck pain. Duration of relief >= 80% pain relief was 6 days with lidocaine and 12 days with bupivacaine, with total relief of >= 50% of 31 days with 55 days respectively.
Keywords: cervical facet or zygapophysial joint pain; controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks; diagnostic accuracy; facet joint nerve blocks; false-positive rate; medial branch blocks; prevalence; Chronic spinal pain.
Similar articles
-
Low Back Pain and Diagnostic Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks: Assessment of Prevalence, False-Positive Rates, and a Philosophical Paradigm Shift from an Acute to a Chronic Pain Model.Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):519-530. Pain Physician. 2020. PMID: 32967394
-
Facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain: an evaluation of prevalence and false-positive rate of diagnostic blocks.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Oct;20(7):539-45. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577812. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007. PMID: 17912133
-
Prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain in postsurgical patients by controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;88(4):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.01.015. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007. PMID: 17398245
-
Cervical zygapophysial (facet) joint pain: effectiveness of interventional management strategies.Postgrad Med. 2016 Jan;128(1):54-68. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1105092. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Postgrad Med. 2016. PMID: 26653406 Review.
-
Medial Branch Blocks for Diagnosis of Facet Joint Pain Etiology and Use in Chronic Pain Litigation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217932. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33137975 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Radiofrequency Neurotomy in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 10;14:2859-2891. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S323362. eCollection 2021. J Pain Res. 2021. PMID: 34531682 Free PMC article.
-
7. Cervical facet pain: Degenerative alterations and whiplash-associated disorder.Pain Pract. 2025 Feb;25(2):e70005. doi: 10.1111/papr.70005. Pain Pract. 2025. PMID: 39846460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization Patterns of Facet Joint Interventions in Managing Spinal Pain in a Medicare Population.Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):505-527. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00476-3. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Pain Ther. 2023. PMID: 36723804 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-perceived duration of effect of lidocaine and bupivacaine following diagnostic medial branch blocks; a multicenter study.Interv Pain Med. 2022 Mar 18;1(2):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100083. eCollection 2022 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 39239364 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the feasibility of equine in-vivo ultrasound technique for the medial branch of the dorsal ramus of the cervical spinal nerves.Vet Q. 2024 Dec;44(1):1-5. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2024.2403456. Epub 2024 Sep 13. Vet Q. 2024. PMID: 39267500 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous