Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes
- PMID: 33185770
- DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02328-x
Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: To present a novel technique for the repair of parastomal hernias.
Methods: A total of 15 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair. A robotic Sugarbaker technique was utilized for repair. The fascial defect was closed prior to robotic intraperitoneal placement of the mesh. Baseline demographics of the patients were obtained, and intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were tracked.
Results: The etiology of the ostomies was oncologic in all but three patients. Five of the stomas were urostomies (33.3%). Patient characteristics were as follows: age 64.9.1 ± 9.3 years, BMI 30.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2, smoking history 60.0%, and diabetes 6.7%. The mean size of the hernia defect was 46.0 ± 40.1 cm2 with a mesh size of 372.0 ± 101.2 cm2. The mean operative time was 182.0 ± 51.9 min. In seven patients, an inferolateral preperitoneal flap was created for mesh placement. Intraoperatively, only one enterotomy was made during dissection, which was repaired without complication. The mean length of stay was 4.2 ± 1.9 days. There was only one hernia recurrence (6.7%). There were no wound complications, surgical site infections, or mesh infections. A mean follow-up time of 14.2 ± 9.4 months was achieved.
Conclusions: Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair is a safe and effective technique. The results demonstrate the feasibility of fascial closure with this technique and a low recurrence rate. The authors propose this technique should be widely considered for parastomal hernia repair.
Keywords: Hernia; Parastomal; Robotic; Sugarbaker.
Similar articles
-
Robotic parastomal hernia repair: A single-center cohort study.Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2627-2634. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01969-2. Epub 2024 Sep 2. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 39223401
-
Robotic sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: updated series and outcomes.Hernia. 2025 Jan 3;29(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03227-1. Hernia. 2025. PMID: 39751991
-
Early outcomes of robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for end colostomy parastomal hernia repair.Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2235-2243. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03152-3. Epub 2024 Aug 30. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 39212762
-
Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Mar;27(3):573-584. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05412-y. Epub 2022 Dec 5. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 36469282
-
Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: keyhole, Sugarbaker, sandwich, or hybrid technique with 3D mesh? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 29;408(1):448. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03177-9. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 38017096 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Robotic parastomal hernia repair in Ileal-conduit patients: short-term results in a single-center cohort study.Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2245-2253. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03153-2. Epub 2024 Sep 6. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 39240470
-
[Robotic hernia surgery IV. German version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results].Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Nov;93(11):1051-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01715-7. Epub 2022 Oct 10. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022. PMID: 36214850 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Robotic Retromuscular (Recurrent) Parastomal Hernia Repair (r-Pauli-Repair) With Synthetically Reinforced Biological Mesh; Technique, Early Experience, and Short-Term Follow-Up.J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Dec 13;2:12059. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.12059. eCollection 2023. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023. PMID: 38312416 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic parastomal hernia repair: A single-center cohort study.Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2627-2634. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01969-2. Epub 2024 Sep 2. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 39223401
-
Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of a recurrent ileostomy prolapse.J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Feb 6;2022(2):rjac013. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac013. eCollection 2022 Feb. J Surg Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 35145626 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Styliński R, Alzubedi A, Sł R (2018) Parastomal hernia: current knowledge and treatment. Wideochirurgia I Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 13:1–8
-
- Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793 - DOI
-
- Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas-analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Color Dis 5:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00403.x - DOI
-
- Husain SG, Cataldo TE (2008) Late stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:31–40 - DOI
-
- Gillern S, Bleier JIS (2014) Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394090 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources