Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;25(3):809-815.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02328-x. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes

Affiliations

Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes

S A Ayuso et al. Hernia. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To present a novel technique for the repair of parastomal hernias.

Methods: A total of 15 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair. A robotic Sugarbaker technique was utilized for repair. The fascial defect was closed prior to robotic intraperitoneal placement of the mesh. Baseline demographics of the patients were obtained, and intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were tracked.

Results: The etiology of the ostomies was oncologic in all but three patients. Five of the stomas were urostomies (33.3%). Patient characteristics were as follows: age 64.9.1 ± 9.3 years, BMI 30.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2, smoking history 60.0%, and diabetes 6.7%. The mean size of the hernia defect was 46.0 ± 40.1 cm2 with a mesh size of 372.0 ± 101.2 cm2. The mean operative time was 182.0 ± 51.9 min. In seven patients, an inferolateral preperitoneal flap was created for mesh placement. Intraoperatively, only one enterotomy was made during dissection, which was repaired without complication. The mean length of stay was 4.2 ± 1.9 days. There was only one hernia recurrence (6.7%). There were no wound complications, surgical site infections, or mesh infections. A mean follow-up time of 14.2 ± 9.4 months was achieved.

Conclusions: Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair is a safe and effective technique. The results demonstrate the feasibility of fascial closure with this technique and a low recurrence rate. The authors propose this technique should be widely considered for parastomal hernia repair.

Keywords: Hernia; Parastomal; Robotic; Sugarbaker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Styliński R, Alzubedi A, Sł R (2018) Parastomal hernia: current knowledge and treatment. Wideochirurgia I Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 13:1–8
    1. Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793 - DOI
    1. Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas-analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Color Dis 5:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00403.x - DOI
    1. Husain SG, Cataldo TE (2008) Late stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:31–40 - DOI
    1. Gillern S, Bleier JIS (2014) Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394090 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources