Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 13:9:e55529.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.55529.

Smchd1 is a maternal effect gene required for genomic imprinting

Affiliations

Smchd1 is a maternal effect gene required for genomic imprinting

Iromi Wanigasuriya et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Genomic imprinting establishes parental allele-biased expression of a suite of mammalian genes based on parent-of-origin specific epigenetic marks. These marks are under the control of maternal effect proteins supplied in the oocyte. Here we report epigenetic repressor Smchd1 as a novel maternal effect gene that regulates the imprinted expression of ten genes in mice. We also found zygotic SMCHD1 had a dose-dependent effect on the imprinted expression of seven genes. Together, zygotic and maternal SMCHD1 regulate three classic imprinted clusters and eight other genes, including non-canonical imprinted genes. Interestingly, the loss of maternal SMCHD1 does not alter germline DNA methylation imprints pre-implantation or later in gestation. Instead, what appears to unite most imprinted genes sensitive to SMCHD1 is their reliance on polycomb-mediated methylation as germline or secondary imprints, therefore we propose that SMCHD1 acts downstream of polycomb imprints to mediate its function.

Keywords: H3K27me3 imprints; Smchd1; allele-specific gene expression; developmental biology; genetics; genomic imprinting; genomics; maternal effect gene; mouse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

IW, QG, SK, AT, TB, ER, KB, JS, KH, HL, AK, MR, MB No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Maternal deletion of Smchd1 during oocyte development depletes SMCHD1 until the 16-cell embryonic stage.
(a) Schematic for maternal deletion of Smchd1. (b) Deletion of Smchd1 in oocyte development with MMTV-Cre and Zp3-Cre. Arrowheads indicate primordial follicle oocyte nuclei, white dotted lines surround primary-antral follicle oocytes. Smchd1 (magenta), c-KIT (yellow), DAPI (cyan). n = 15–27 sections for two ovaries per cohort. A total of 5–20 follicles were observed for primordial – late secondary stages and 2–3 antral follicles for each genotype. (c) Detection of paternal SMCHD1-GFP from day 1.5 to 3.5 in pre-implantation embryos. Smchd1GFP/GFP embryos were used as positive controls. (d) Detection of maternal SMCHD1-GFP in the nuclei of E2.5 (8 cell) embryos, with Smchd1+/+ used as negative controls. Nuclei marked with DAPI (cyan). Scale bar – 50 µm.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Maternal deletion of Smchd1 does not affect pup viability or weight.
Zygotic SMCHD1 has a limited contribution to the embryonic SMCHD1 pool in the early embryo. (a) Embryo lethality data for Smchd1 maternal null embryos and animals at weaning, compared to wild-type control litters generated from Smchd1fl/fl non-transgenic dams, or heterozygous litters generated from a reciprocal cross. The p-value was calculated using Student's two-tailed t-test. (b) Smchd1 mutations in the dam do not influence pup weights at P2. Student's two-tailed t-test. (c) Immunofluorescence detection of maternal SMCHD1-GFP in the nuclei of 8-cell embryos, with Smchd1+/+ used as negative controls and Smchd1GFP/GFP embryos were used as positive controls. Zygotic SMCHD1 was detectable in some cells from the 8-cell stage onward but comparatively less signal intensity to the GFP control when embryos were imaged with identical settings, in experiments performed on the same day. n ≥ 2 embryos.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.. Minor global gene expression changes in Smchd1matΔ placentae and embryos.
(a) Intersection of the differentially expressed gene lists in MMTV-Cre and Zp3-Cre maternal deletion experiments, E14.5 placental samples. (b–d) MA-plots of total gene expression in MMTV-Cre (b) and Zp3-Cre (c) maternal deletion experiments, E14.5 placental samples, and MMTV-Cre E9.5 embryos (d). Genes below the 5% FDR and differentially expressed by at least two-fold are plotted in black. Smchd1 and genes with a partial loss of imprinting are labeled.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Heterozygous deletion of Smchd1 results in partial loss of imprinting at known SMCHD1-sensitive clusters.
(a-b) Expression of the silent allele as a proportion of total expression of the gene, obtained by allele-specific RNA-seq from the embryonic portion of the placenta of Smchd1 wild-type (wt), heterozygous (het) and maternal null (matΔ) conceptuses. Expression data for (a) Snrpn cluster genes on chromosome seven and (b) Igf2r cluster genes on chromosome 17. (c) Percentage methylation (% mC) on the maternal and paternal alleles at primary and secondary DMRs at Snrpn and Igf2r clusters in Smchd1 maternal null and wild-type placental samples. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in mean silent allele proportions between genotypes is of at least 5%. RNA-seq sample sizes: for maternal deletion experiment, MMTV-Cre 6 wt and seven matΔ, Zp3-Cre 4 wt and four matΔ; for the heterozygous deletion experiment, 4 wt and six het E14.5 placental samples. RRBS: n = 4 MMTV-Cre for both matΔ and wt E14.5 placental samples.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. Allele-specific gene expression changes in Smchd1matΔ placentae and embryos.
(a) Heatmap of maternal allele expression proportion for genes that are differentially imprinted in at least one experimental set (MMTV-Cre and Zp3-Cre E14.5 placenta). (b) MA-plots of allelic gene expression in MMTV-Cre E9.5 embryos and E14.5 placentae, and Zp3-Cre E14.5 placentae. Genes below the 5% FDR and differentially expressed by at least two-fold are plotted in color. Smchd1 and genes with partial loss of imprinting are labeled. (c) Absolute expression levels (normalized log counts per million) for genes of the Snrpn cluster, showing non-split (total) and allele-split (maternal and paternal) counts. This shows the increase in silent-allele proportion for Peg12, Ndn, and Magel2 is explained by an increase in silent allele levels rather than a decrease in expressed allele levels.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.. Global differential gene expression in Smchd1 heterozygous (paternally deleted) placentae, Snrpn cluster allele-specific expression in Smchd1matΔ embryos, and CpG island differential methylation in Smchd1matΔ placentae.
(a) Schematic for breeding scheme to generate heterozygous (het) deletion of Smchd1. Strain background is shown underneath each parent. Genotype is shown above each parent. (b) MA-plot of the total gene expression in the heterozygous deletion experiment. (c) Expression of the silent allele as a proportion of total expression of the gene at the Snprn cluster genes Ndn and Peg12, in E9.5 Smchd1 maternal null embryos. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in silent allele proportions is at least 5%. (d) Scatter plot of CGI methylation in wt and maternal null placentae. 33 and 42 DMRs were found to be hypo- and hypermethylated in the matΔ placentae, respectively (logistic regression, 10 observations minimum, 5% FDR and at least 10% absolute difference in methylation levels between the wt and matΔ).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Maternal and heterozygous deletions of Smchd1 result in loss of imprinting at the Kcnq1 imprinted cluster without changes to primary or secondary DMR methylation.
(a) Expression of the silent allele as a proportion of total expression of the gene, obtained by allele-specific RNA-seq from the embryonic portion of the placenta of Smchd1 wild-type (wt), heterozygous (het), and maternal null (matΔ) conceptuses. Expression data for (a) Kcnq1 cluster genes on chromosome 7, and (b) Percentage methylation (% mC) for each parental allele at the DMRs for the Kcnq1 cluster. Kcnq1-I1: Kcnq1-Intergenic1; Kcnq1-I2: Kcnq1-Intergenic2 *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in silent allele proportions is of at least 5%. RNA-seq sample sizes: for maternal deletion experiment, MMTV-Cre 6 wt and seven matΔ, Zp3-Cre 4 wt and four matΔ; for the heterozygous deletion experiment, 4 wt and six het E14.5 placental samples. RRBS: n = 4 MMTV-Cre for both matΔ and wt E14.5 placental samples.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. ChIP-seq for SMCHD1-GFP over the Kcnq1 (a), Snrpn (b), and Igf2r-Airn (c) imprinted clusters in E14.5 placenta and neural stem cells.
Enriched Domain Detector (EDD) enrichment scores over 3 kb bins and called enriched regions are shown for the placenta (one sample) and neural stem cells (pooled triplicate). MACS2-broad SMCHD1-GFP ChIP-seq peaks are also shown. H3K4me3, H3K36me3, and H3K27me3-marked regions are retrieved from Hanna et al., 2019 for E7.5 extraembryonic tissue.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Only maternal deletion of Smchd1 results in loss of imprinting at lone imprinted genes.
(a) Expression of the silent allele as a proportion of total expression of the gene, obtained by allele-specific RNA-seq from the embryonic portion of the placenta of Smchd1 wild-type (wt), heterozygous (het), and maternal null (matΔ) conceptuses, at lone imprinted genes: Sfmbt2, Jade1, Platr4, Smoc1, Epop and Spp1. (b) Percentage methylation (% mC) for each parental allele at the DMRs for Sfmbt2 and Jade1. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in silent allele proportions is of at least 5%. RNA-seq sample sizes: for maternal deletion experiment, MMTV-Cre 6 wt and seven matΔ, Zp3-Cre 4 wt and four matΔ; for the heterozygous deletion experiment, 4 wt and six het E14.5 placental samples. RRBS: n = 4 MMTV-Cre for both matΔ and wt E14.5 placental samples.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Homozygous zygotic deletion of Smchd1 generally results in more severe loss of imprinting at genes sensitive to maternal or heterozygous deletions.
MMTV-Cre Smchd1 maternal deletion data and heterozygous deletion data (F1 wt, F1 matΔ, F1 het) from Figures 1 and 2, along with samples produced to compare Smchd1 wild-type (wt), oocyte-deleted (matΔ), zygote-deleted (zygΔ), and oocyte-and-zygote-deleted (matzygΔ) genotypes. Samples from the embryonic portion of the placenta and expression of the silent allele is shown as a proportion of total expression of the gene, obtained by allele-specific RNA-seq. (a) Snrpn cluster genes. (b) Igf2r-Airn cluster genes. (c) Sfmbt2, Jade1, Platr4, Smoc1, Epop, and Spp1 genes. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in silent allele proportions is at least 5%. RNA-seq sample sizes: for maternal deletion experiment, 10 wt and 11 matΔ; for the heterozygous deletion experiment, 4 wt and six het; for the maternal and zygotic deletion experiment, 13 wt, seven matΔ, eight zygΔ, and six matzygΔ E14.5 MMTV-Cre placentae.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Allele-specific expression in maternal, zygotic, and maternal-and-zygotic Smchd1-deleted samples.
(a) Schematic for the breeding scheme to generate oocyte (matΔ), zygotic (zygΔ), oocyte-and-zygotic deletion (matzygΔ) of Smchd1. Strain background is shown underneath each parent. Genotype is shown above each parent. Allele-specific RNA-seq expression profiles of the silent allele are shown as a proportion of total expression at the (b) Snrpn cluster in E9.5 embryo (c) Kcnq1 cluster in the embryonic portion of the placenta at E14.5. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in silent allele proportions is at least 5%.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Maternal SMCHD1 establishes an epigenetic memory required for imprinted gene expression.
(a) Summarised analysis of SMCHD1-sensitive imprinted genes from E14.5 placentae and E9.5 embryos in E2.75 embryo transcriptome sequencing. (b) Expression of the silent allele as a proportion of total expression of the gene, obtained by allele-specific RNA-seq from whole E2.75 Smchd1 maternal null (matΔ) and wild-type (wt) embryos. (c) Percentage methylation (% mC) on each parental allele for the DMRs of SMCHD1-sensitive imprinted clusters and genes in Smchd1 maternal null (matΔ) compared with control (wt) E2.75 embryos. Kcnq1-I1: Kcnq1-Intergenic1; Kcnq1-I2: Kcnq1-Intergenic2 *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, when the difference in silent allele proportions is at least 5%. n = 5 wt and n = 8 matΔ E2.75 embryos.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.. MA-plots of total (a) and allelic (b,c) gene expression in MMTV-Cre maternal deletion E2.75 embryos experiments.
Genes below the 5% FDR and differentially expressed by at least 2-fold are plotted in black. Smchd1 and genes with partial loss of imprinting are labeled. (d-f) Genome-wide differential DNA methylation analysis in matΔ E2.75 embryos at CGIs (d), promoters (e) and in 10 kb windows tiling the genome (f). Differentially methylated regions (edgeR, 5% FDR and 10% absolute difference in DNA methylation level): three hyper- and- five hypomethylated CpG islands, 37 hyper- and eight hypomethylated promoters, 826 hyper- and 46 hypomethylated 10 kb windows.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. SMCHD1 translates the imprints to establish a heritable chromatin state required for imprinted expression later in development.
(a) Developmental windows of activity of maternal and zygotic SMCHD1. (b) Proposed model illustrating the regulation of imprinted genes by SMCHD1. Both oocyte and zygotic SMCHD1 contribute to an epigenetic memory downstream of polycomb repressive histone marks.

References

    1. Alexander KA, Wang X, Shibata M, Clark AG, García-García MJ. TRIM28 controls genomic imprinting through distinct mechanisms during and after early Genome-wide reprogramming. Cell Reports. 2015;13:1194–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andergassen D, Dotter CP, Wenzel D, Sigl V, Bammer PC, Muckenhuber M, Mayer D, Kulinski TM, Theussl H-C, Penninger JM, Bock C, Barlow DP, Pauler FM, Hudson QJ. Mapping the mouse allelome reveals tissue-specific regulation of allelic expression. eLife. 2017;6:e25125. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25125. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andergassen D, Muckenhuber M, Bammer PC, Kulinski TM, Theussl HC, Shimizu T, Penninger JM, Pauler FM, Hudson QJ. The airn lncRNA does not require any DNA elements within its locus to silence distant imprinted genes. PLOS Genetics. 2019;15:e1008268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008268. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews S. Babraham Bioinformatics; 2007. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/seqmonk/
    1. Andrews S. Babraham Bioinformatics; 2010. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/

Publication types

Substances

Associated data