SIRS or not SIRS: Is that the infection? A critical review of the sepsis definition criteria
- PMID: 33186343
- DOI: 10.24875/BMHIM.20000202
SIRS or not SIRS: Is that the infection? A critical review of the sepsis definition criteria
Abstract
The modern approach to sepsis has focused on creating a global consensus with different criteria to early investigate it in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this complex entity. Until the third and last consensus of adults (Sepsis-3), the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was the diagnostic pillar used by default for all ages. In Sepsis-3, it was decided to withdraw the SIRS, which generated an international debate about the timing of such change. This narrative review develops the history of the different definitions of sepsis focused on SIRS, their strengths and weaknesses, and the relevance of the different elements that caused the debate. Given the absence of pediatric updates in Sepsis-3, a particular emphasis is placed on the implications for future definitions of sepsis at this stage of life.
El enfoque moderno de la sepsis se ha centrado en la creación de consensos globales que utilizan distintos criterios para pesquisarla en forma precoz, con el fin de disminuir la morbimortalidad asociada a ella. Hasta la aparición del tercer y último consenso de adultos (Sepsis-3), el síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica (SIRS) fue el pilar diagnóstico utilizado por defecto en todas las edades. En Sepsis-3 se decidió retirar el SIRS, lo que generó un debate internacional sobre la oportunidad de dicho cambio. Esta revisión narrativa desarrolla la historia de las distintas definiciones de sepsis centradas en SIRS, las fortalezas, las debilidades y la pertinencia de los distintos elementos que ocasionaron el debate. Dada la ausencia de actualizaciones pediátricas en Sepsis-3, se hace especial énfasis en las implicaciones para las futuras definiciones de sepsis en esta etapa de la vida.
Keywords: Choque séptico; Definición; Definition; Pediatrics; Pediatría; SIRS; Sepsis; Septic shock; qSOFA.
Copyright: © 2020 Permanyer.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26903335 Free PMC article.
-
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 29100549 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5. Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28342442 Free PMC article.
-
International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005. PMID: 15636651 Review.
-
SIRS or qSOFA? Is that the question? Clinical and methodological observations from a meta-analysis and critical review on the prognostication of patients with suspected sepsis outside the ICU.Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1965-0. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Intern Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30324278 Review.
Cited by
-
Application Prospect of the SOFA Score and Related Modification Research Progress in Sepsis.J Clin Med. 2023 May 16;12(10):3493. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103493. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37240599 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diabetic foot ulcers: Retrospective comparative analysis from Sicily between two eras.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0259405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259405. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34874944 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular mechanisms in septic shock (Review).Exp Ther Med. 2021 Oct;22(4):1161. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10595. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Exp Ther Med. 2021. PMID: 34504606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pathophysiological dynamics in the contact, coagulation, and complement systems during sepsis: Potential targets for nafamostat mesilate.J Intensive Med. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):453-467. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.02.003. eCollection 2024 Oct. J Intensive Med. 2024. PMID: 39310056 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical predictive value of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index for prognosis of critically ill patients with sepsis in intensive care unit: a retrospective single-center observational study.Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1395134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395134. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38841671 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical