Conical Primary Cementless Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: 94 Consecutive Implantations at a Mean Follow-Up of 12.7 years
- PMID: 33187858
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.006
Conical Primary Cementless Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: 94 Consecutive Implantations at a Mean Follow-Up of 12.7 years
Abstract
Background: Revision of a failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) poses technical challenges. The use of primary stems for revision can be advantageous for maintaining bone stock and reducing complications: small case series have reported promising results in the short-term to mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and functional results and survivorship of a consecutive series of THA femoral component revisions using a conical primary cementless stem (PCS).
Methods: Ninety-four stem revisions with a preoperative Paprosky I or II defect were analyzed at an average follow-up of 12.7 ± 5.4 years. Aseptic loosening was the reason for revision in 92.5% of cases. Twenty patients were lost to follow-up. Two subgroups were created: Group 1 (n = 59) underwent isolated stem revision; Group 2 (n = 15) underwent complete THA revision. All were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively based on the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) score, and the visual analog scale for pain (VAS). Residual trochanteric pain and length discrepancies were recorded. Radiographic evaluation included signs of osteolysis, subsidence, loosening, and heterotopic ossification.
Results: PCS survivorship was 100% at 5 years and 95.9% at 10 years. Overall, significant postoperative improvements (P < .01) were observed on the HHS (44.3 vs 86.9), WOMAC (42.8 vs 82.8), and VAS (7.0 vs 3.0). Postoperative scores on all scales were higher for Group 1 (P < .01). Three patients (4.1%) underwent further stem revision. Demarcation lines (1 mm) were found in 12 (16.2%) patients and significant heterotopic ossifications in 22 (29.7%).
Conclusion: The use of PCS for stem revision in failed THA with a limited femoral bone defect is a reliable option for both isolated stem revision and concomitant cup revision in well-selected patients.
Keywords: aseptic loosening; hip revision surgery; primary cementless stem; survivorship; total hip arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem.J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3697-3702. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.052. Epub 2020 Jun 25. J Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 32713726
-
Downsizing in total hip arthroplasty. A short stem as a revision implant.Orthopade. 2022 Mar;51(3):230-238. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04168-8. Epub 2021 Sep 28. Orthopade. 2022. PMID: 34581833 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1369-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05066-8. Epub 2023 Oct 24. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 37872437 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term results of custom-made femoral stems.Orthopade. 2020 May;49(5):408-416. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03901-z. Orthopade. 2020. PMID: 32240324 Review. English.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and re-revision rates are not associated with the indication for revision total hip arthroplasty : a prospective evaluation of 647 consecutive patients.Bone Joint J. 2022 Jul;104-B(7):859-866. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1739.R1. Bone Joint J. 2022. PMID: 35775171 Review.
Cited by
-
[Strategies for stem revision : Surgery planning, implant removal and reimplantation].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Jan;52(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04277-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 35802156 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Management of Severe Bone Defects in Femoral Revision following Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip Pelvis. 2024 Jun 1;36(2):101-107. doi: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.101. Hip Pelvis. 2024. PMID: 38825819 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Zweymüller primary stem is a reliable, effective, and less invasive implant in revision hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type I and II defects.Bone Jt Open. 2025 Feb 13;6(2):186-194. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0182.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2025. PMID: 39945124 Free PMC article.
-
[Medium- and long-term effectiveness of hip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem in patients with Paprosky type Ⅰ- Ⅲ femoral bone defect].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):842-848. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202403053. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 39013822 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Cementless Primary Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 21;13(2):604. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020604. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38276110 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical