Antimicrobial stewardship by Australian community pharmacists: Uptake, collaboration, challenges, and needs
- PMID: 33187894
- DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.10.014
Antimicrobial stewardship by Australian community pharmacists: Uptake, collaboration, challenges, and needs
Abstract
Objective: To assess community pharmacists' (CPs') awareness and uptake of evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies, attitudes toward collaboration with general practitioners (GPs), and needs to improve AMS practices.
Methods: A nationwide survey of randomly sampled community pharmacies across Australia was conducted in April-October 2019.
Results: The response rate of CPs was 30.7% (613 of 2000) and 592 participating CPs (96.5%) described the key barriers to and facilitators of improving AMS. CPs (447 of 613, 72.9%) were familiar with AMS but felt that they would require training (468 of 612, 76.5%) and access to AMS practice guidelines (566 of 605, 93.6%). Respondents perceived that AMS programs could reduce the inappropriate use of antimicrobials (409 of 612, 66.8%) and the costs of treating infection (508 of 612, 83.0%). CPs often counseled patients (591 of 609, 97.0%) and reviewed drug interactions or allergies (569 of 607, 93.8%) before dispensing antimicrobials. Respondents less often used the national Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic (274 of 602, 45.5%) or assessed guideline-compliance of prescribed antimicrobials (231 of 609, 37.9%). CPs were less likely to communicate with GPs (254 of 609, 41.8%) when an antimicrobial prescription was believed to be suboptimal and perceived that GPs are not receptive to their intervention regarding the antimicrobial choice (500 of 606, 82.6%) and dosage (416 of 606, 68.6%). Point-of-care tests (114 of 596, 19.1%) and patient information leaflets (149 of 608, 24.5%) were used uncommonly. Most respondents supported policies that could foster GP-pharmacist collaboration (560 of 606, 92.4%), limit accessibility of selected antimicrobials (420 of 604, 74.4%), and reduce repeat-dispensing of antimicrobial prescriptions (448 of 604, 74.2%). CPs faced interpersonal, interactional, structural, and resource-level barriers to collaborate with GPs for practicing AMS.
Conclusions: CPs are aware of the importance of sensible use of antimicrobials but have had limited training and resources to conduct AMS activities. Improving GPs' receptiveness and system structures for increased GP-CP collaboration seem to be a priority to accelerate CP-led AMS implementation. Further study is required to understand the views of stakeholders about the feasibility of implementing evidence-based GP-CP collaborative AMS approaches.
Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association®. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Divergent and Convergent Attitudes and Views of General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists to Collaboratively Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Australia: A Nationwide Study.Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 5;10(1):47. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010047. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33466476 Free PMC article.
-
A Nationwide Survey of Australian General Practitioners on Antimicrobial Stewardship: Awareness, Uptake, Collaboration with Pharmacists and Improvement Strategies.Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jun 8;9(6):310. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060310. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32521720 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and implementation of a national survey to assess antimicrobial stewardship awareness, practices and perceptions amongst community pharmacists in Australia.J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Jun;21:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Sep 7. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020. PMID: 31505297
-
Development of an antimicrobial stewardship implementation model involving collaboration between general practitioners and pharmacists: GPPAS study in Australian primary care.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Jan 28;22:e2. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000687. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021. PMID: 33504411 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices of Community Pharmacists Towards Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Systematic Scoping Review.Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Dec 12;8(4):263. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040263. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31842511 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Antimicrobial stewardship in Australia: the role of qualitative research in programme development.JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Nov 18;3(4):dlab166. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab166. eCollection 2021 Dec. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021. PMID: 34806005 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Divergent and Convergent Attitudes and Views of General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists to Collaboratively Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Australia: A Nationwide Study.Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 5;10(1):47. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010047. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33466476 Free PMC article.
-
Community pharmacists as antimicrobial guardians and gatekeepers - A qualitative study of the perspectives of pharmacy sector stakeholders.Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Dec 13;9:100212. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100212. eCollection 2023 Mar. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022. PMID: 36582997 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices of Community Pharmacists in United Arab Emirates.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;12(8):1238. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081238. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37627658 Free PMC article.
-
Determining a future policy focus to support antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacy: A modified Delphi study.Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 May 23;14:100456. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100456. eCollection 2024 Jun. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024. PMID: 38948387 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous