Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;5(6):e001051.
doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001051.

Bratislava Statement: consensus recommendations for improving pancreatic cancer care

Affiliations
Review

Bratislava Statement: consensus recommendations for improving pancreatic cancer care

Joan Prades et al. ESMO Open. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal tumours, and it is the fourth cause of cancer death in Europe. Despite its important public health impact, no effective treatments exist, nor are there high-visibility research efforts to improve care. This alarming situation is emblematic of a larger group of cancer diseases, known as neglected cancers. To address the impact of these diseases, the European Commission-supported Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer launched a multi-stakeholder initiative to determine key steps that healthcare systems can rapidly implement to improve their response. A working group comprising 20 representatives from European medical societies, patient associations, cancer plan organisations and other relevant European healthcare stakeholders was organised. A consensus process based on the results of different studies, discussion of research outcomes, and development and endorsement of draft statements resulted in 22 consensus recommendations (the Bratislava Statement). The statement argues that substantial improvements can be achieved in patient outcomes by centralising pancreatic cancer care around state-of-the-art reference centres, staffed by expert multidisciplinary teams capable of providing high-quality care. This organisational model requires a specific care framework encompassing primary, palliative and survivorship care, and a policy environment prioritising the use of quality criteria and performance assessments as well as research investments dedicated to prevention, risk prediction, early detection and diagnosis. In order to address the challenges posed by neglected cancers in general and pancreatic cancer in particular, a specific control strategy tailored to this reality is required.

Keywords: delivery of health care; health policy; pancreatic neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Minicozzi P, Cassetti T, Vener C, et al. . Analysis of incidence, mortality and survival for pancreatic and biliary tract cancers across Europe, with assessment of influence of revised European age standardisation on estimates. Cancer Epidemiol 2018;55:52–60. 10.1016/j.canep.2018.04.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer 2018;103:356–87. 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, et al. . Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16022. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.22 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, et al. . Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019;16:11–26. 10.1038/s41571-018-0112-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. . Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913–21. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types