Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;27(3):472.e7-472.e10.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres

Affiliations

Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres

Eliseo Albert et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres.

Methods: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR.

Results: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD-) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7-100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0-88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4-99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9-98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD- results (n = 11).

Conclusion: The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious.

Keywords: COVID-19; Early diagnosis; Primary healthcare centre; Rapid antigen detection test (RAD); SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Field performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (RAD) according to time between symptoms onset and testing (T values in specimens testing either RAD + or RAD–. (C) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA loads in specimens testing either RAD + or RAD–. The AMPLIRUN® TOTAL SARS-CoV-2 Control (Vircell SA, Granada, Spain) was used as the reference material for SARS-CoV-2 RNA load quantification (in copies/mL, considering RT-PCR CTs for the N gene; the linear regression equation was: Y = –0.31 × X + 13.77; R2 = 9.89). Median and p values are shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Overview of testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/testing-overview.html Updated September 18.
    1. Pekosz A., Cooper C., Parvu V., Li M., Andrews J., Manabe Y.C. Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.10.02.20205708. 10.02.20205708. - DOI
    1. Linares M., Pérez-Tanoira R., Romanyk J., Pérez-García F., Gómez-Herruz P., Arroyo T. Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms. MedRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.09.20.20198192. 09.20.20198192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young S., Taylor S.N., Cammarata C.L., Varnado K.G., Roger-Dalbert C., Montano A. Clinical evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test performance compared to PCR-based testing and versus the Sofia 2 SARS Antigen point-of-care test. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 (Oct 6):JCM.02338-20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scohy A., Anantharajah A., Bodéus M., Kabamba-Mukadi B., Verroken A., Rodriguez-Villalobos H. Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104455. (Aug) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms