Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
- PMID: 33189872
- PMCID: PMC7662075
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004
Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
Abstract
Objectives: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres.
Methods: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR.
Results: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD-) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7-100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0-88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4-99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9-98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD- results (n = 11).
Conclusion: The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious.
Keywords: COVID-19; Early diagnosis; Primary healthcare centre; Rapid antigen detection test (RAD); SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):636.e1-636.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021. PMID: 33421573 Free PMC article.
-
Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104684. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104684. Epub 2020 Oct 29. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 33176236 Free PMC article.
-
Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost.J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4405-4410. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26985. Epub 2021 Apr 8. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 33788270 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291. JBI Evid Synth. 2024. PMID: 39188132 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of the lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Jun 15;31(2):020601. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.020601. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021. PMID: 34140830 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Prevention Model Application in a Large Retail Company Before the Vaccine Introduction.Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:908690. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908690. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36311617 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of five SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests in a hospital setting and performance of one antigen assay in routine practice: a useful tool to guide isolation precautions?J Hosp Infect. 2021 Aug;114:144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Mar 27. J Hosp Infect. 2021. PMID: 33785377 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Novel COVID-19 nsp8 One-Tube RT-LAMP-CRISPR Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0196222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01962-22. Epub 2022 Nov 29. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 36445095 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.J Lab Physicians. 2022 Apr 25;14(3):324-328. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744237. eCollection 2022 Sep. J Lab Physicians. 2022. PMID: 36119413 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of Antigen-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Routine Hospital Settings.Lab Med. 2021 Nov 2;52(6):e154-e158. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmab033. Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 33928384 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Overview of testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/testing-overview.html Updated September 18.
-
- Pekosz A., Cooper C., Parvu V., Li M., Andrews J., Manabe Y.C. Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.10.02.20205708. 10.02.20205708. - DOI
-
- Young S., Taylor S.N., Cammarata C.L., Varnado K.G., Roger-Dalbert C., Montano A. Clinical evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test performance compared to PCR-based testing and versus the Sofia 2 SARS Antigen point-of-care test. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 (Oct 6):JCM.02338-20. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous