Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 21:11:593215.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.593215. eCollection 2020.

Resistance Mechanisms to Antimicrobial Peptides in Gram-Positive Bacteria

Affiliations
Review

Resistance Mechanisms to Antimicrobial Peptides in Gram-Positive Bacteria

Lucas Assoni et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

With the alarming increase of infections caused by pathogenic multidrug-resistant bacteria over the last decades, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been investigated as a potential treatment for those infections, directly through their lytic effect or indirectly, due to their ability to modulate the immune system. There are still concerns regarding the use of such molecules in the treatment of infections, such as cell toxicity and host factors that lead to peptide inhibition. To overcome these limitations, different approaches like peptide modification to reduce toxicity and peptide combinations to improve therapeutic efficacy are being tested. Human defense peptides consist of an important part of the innate immune system, against a myriad of potential aggressors, which have in turn developed different ways to overcome the AMPs microbicidal activities. Since the antimicrobial activity of AMPs vary between Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, so do the bacterial resistance arsenal. This review discusses the mechanisms exploited by Gram-positive bacteria to circumvent killing by antimicrobial peptides. Specifically, the most clinically relevant genera, Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Gram-positive bacilli, have been explored.

Keywords: AMP; antimicrobial peptides; gram-positive; resistance; streptococci.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Resistance mechanisms to antimicrobial peptides in Gram-positive bacteria. AMP resistance mechanisms employed by Gram-positive bacteria are shown, including alterations in cell envelope charge/composition; AMP inhibition by binding to surface proteins/released capsular polysaccharide; AMP degradation by bacterial proteases; bacterial adaptation to AMP challenge; AMP extrusion by efflux pumps and transport systems.

References

    1. Abachin E., Poyart C., Pellegrini E., Milohanic E., Fiedler F., Berche P., et al. (2002). Formation of D-alanyl-lipoteichoic acid is required foradhesion and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol 43 1–14. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02723.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abi Khattar Z., Rejasse A., Destoumieux-Garzón D., Escoubas J. M., Sanchis V., Lereclus D., et al. (2009). The dlt operon of Bacillus cereus is required for resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides and for virulence in insects. J. Bacteriol. 191 7063–7073. 10.1128/jb.00892-09 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akesson P., Sjoholm A. G., Bjorck L. (1996). Protein SIC, a novel extracellular protein of Streptococcus pyogenes interfering with complement function. J. Biol. Chem. 271 1081–1088. 10.1074/jbc.271.2.1081 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson D. I., Hughes D., Kubicek-Sutherland J. Z. (2016). Mechanisms and consequences of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides. Drug Resist. Updat. 26 43–57. 10.1016/j.drup.2016.04.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andre G. O., Politano W. R., Mirza S., Converso T. R., Ferraz L. F., Leite L. C., et al. (2015). Combined effects of lactoferrin and lysozyme on Streptococcus pneumoniae killing. Microb. Pathog. 89 7–17. 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.08.008 - DOI - PubMed