Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Oct 21:11:535784.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.535784. eCollection 2020.

The Antigen Presenting Potential of CD21low B Cells

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The Antigen Presenting Potential of CD21low B Cells

Marlene E Reincke et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Human CD21low B cells are expanded in autoimmune (AI) diseases and display a unique phenotype with high expression of co-stimulatory molecules, compatible with a potential role as antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Thus, we addressed the co-stimulatory capacity of naïve-like, IgM-memory, switched memory and CD27negIgDneg memory CD21low B cells in allogenic co-cultures with CD4 T cells. CD21low B cells of patients with AI disorders expressed high levels of not only CD86, CD80, and HLA-DR (memory B cells) but also PD-L1 ex vivo and efficiently co-stimulated CD4 T cells of healthy donors (HD), as measured by upregulation of CD25, CD69, inducible co-stimulator (ICOS), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and induction of cytokines. While the co-stimulatory capacity of the different CD21low B-cell populations was over all comparable to CD21pos counterparts of patients and HD, especially switched memory CD21low B cells lacked the increased capacity of CD21pos switched memory B-cells to induce high expression of ICOS, IL-2, IL-10, and IFN-γ. Acknowledging the limitation of the in vitro setting, CD21low B cells do not seem to preferentially support a specific Th effector response. In summary, our data implies that CD21low B cells of patients with AI diseases can become competent APCs and may, when enriched for autoreactive B-cell receptors (BCR), potentially contribute to AI reactions as cognate interaction partners of autoreactive T cells at sites of inflammation.

Keywords: CD21low B cells; T cell; antigen-presenting cells; autoimmunity; co-stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) General gating strategy for different CD21low and CD21pos B-cell subsets. CD19pos B cells delineated by CD19 and CD21 were separated into naïve (a), IgM memory (IgM mem) (b), switched memory (sw mem) (c), and CD27negIgDneg memory (CD27negIgDneg mem) B cells (d) by expression of IgD and CD27. Subsequent gating on CD21posCD38low-intermediate and CD21lowCD38low B cells allowed the differentiation of CD21pos and CD21low B cells, respectively. (B) FACS plots showing CD21 and CD11c, FCRL5, CD95, ICAM-1, CD40 and CXCR5 in naive, IgM mem, sw mem and CD27negIgDneg mem B cells in one representative AI patient. (C) Graphs show the MFI of CD80, CD86 and HLA-DR in CD21pos B-cell subpopulations of healthy donors (HD) and CD21pos and CD21low B-cell subsets of patients with autoimmune (AI) diseases in naïve, IgM mem, sw mem and CD27negIgDneg mem B cells. Statistical differences were considered significant at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. RA, SLE, sarcoidosis, psoriatic arthritis, and spondyloarthropathy were marked by different symbols as indicated in the legend. ns, not significant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Representative histogram overlays for the expression of CD80 and CD86 on naïve B cells of HD unstimulated, stimulated with SEB, CpG and in T-B co-cultures without or in the presence of SEB. (B) Histogram overlays for CD80 (upper line) and CD86 (bottom line) of naïve, IgM mem, switched mem and CD27negIgDneg mem CD21pos B cells of one representative HD (black solid line) and CD21pos (blue solid line) and CD21low B cells (red solid line) of one representative AI patient in Staphylococcus enterotoxin B (SEB-) stimulated co-cultures with allogenic T cells and statistical analysis thereof. Differences were considered significant at *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. The different diseases were marked by different symbols as indicated in the legend.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Representative histogram overlay displaying CD69 expression in unstimulated T cells (T only) or T-B co-cultures with naïve CD21pos B cells of a HD or naïve CD21low B cells of an AI patients in the absence (T + (B) or presence of SEB (T + B + SEB) gated on naïve T cells. (BD) Histogram overlays for CD69, CD25 and Inducible Co-stimulator (ICOS) on naïve (CD45RApos) CD4 T cells co-cultured with naïve, IgM mem, sw mem and CD27negIgDneg mem B-cell populations of CD21pos B cells of one representative HD and CD21pos and CD21low populations of one representative patient and statistical analysis thereof. T cells cultured alone and with or without stimulation with SEB were obtained as control. Subsets marked in green (*) were significantly different to the SEB-stimulated T-cell control (p < 0.05). All subsets were statistically significant to unstimulated T cells. Differences were considered significant at *p < 0.05 * and **p < 0.01. The different diseases were marked by different symbols as indicated in the legend.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histogram overlays for CD69 (A), CD25 (B), and ICOS (C) expression on memory (CD45RAneg) CD4 T cells co-cultured with naïve, IgM mem, sw mem and CD27negIgDneg mem B-cell populations of CD21pos B cells of one representative HD and CD21pos and CD21low populations of one representative patient and statistical analysis thereof. T cells cultured alone and with or without stimulation with SEB were obtained as control. (D) Representative FACS plot for CD4 and PD-1 or the FMO in unstimulated T cells, T cells stimulated with SEB and T cells co-cultured with naïve CD21pos B cells of HD or naive CD21low B cells of a patient in the absence or presence of SEB. Graph shows the proportion of PD-1 positive memory T cells in T-cell cultures stimulated as indicated to unstimulated T cells. Subsets marked with green stars were significantly different to the SEB-stimulated T-cell controls. Differences were considered significant at *p < 0.05. The different diseases were marked by different symbols as indicated in the legend. **p < 0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Cytokines measured in supernatants of T-B co-cultures. Production of TNF-α, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 was measured in T-B co-cultures with different B-cell subsets of AI patients and HD. Subsets marked in green were significantly different to the SEB-stimulated T-cell control. (B) Intracellular cytokine staining of TNF-α and IL-10 versus CD19 in T-B co-cultures with and without SEB and T-cell SEB control. Representative FACS Plots of co-cultures with naïve B cells of HD are displayed. Data are representative for 1–3 times for each CD21low B-cell subpopulation of patients and 2–4 times of each CD21pos B-cell subpopulations of HD in 4 independent experiments. Differences were considered significant at *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rodríguez-Pinto D. B cells as antigen presenting cells. Cell Immunol (2005) 238(2):67–75. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2006.02.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y-J, Barthélémy C, Bouteiller OD, Arpin C, Isabelle D, Banchereau J. Memory B cells from human tonsils colonize mucosal epithelium and directly present antigen to T cells by Rapid Up-Regulation of B7-1 and B7-2. Immunity (1995) 2(3):239–48. 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90048-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tangye SG, Good KL. Human IgM+CD27+ B cells: Memory B cells or “memory” B cells? J Immunol (2007) 179(1):13–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.13 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sansom DM. CD28, CTLA-4 and their ligands: Who does what and to whom? Immunology (2000) 101(2):169–77. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00121.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moir S, Malaspina A, Ogwaro KM, Donoghue ET, Hallahan CW, Ehler LA, et al. HIV-1 induces phenotypic and functional perturbations of B cells in chronically infected individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2001) 98(18):10362–7. 10.1073/pnas.181347898 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types