Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 23:11:570649.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649. eCollection 2020.

Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review

Affiliations

Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review

Giovanna Elisa Calabrò et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Background: The huge development of omics sciences is changing the classical medical approach and making new technologies available. In this context, education of citizens is essential to allow appropriate decisions about their own health. Hence, we aimed to summarize existing literature regarding citizens' knowledge, attitudes, and educational needs on omics sciences. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) using Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, and Embase databases. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies investigated knowledge, attitudes, or educational needs regarding omics sciences among the general population. Results: We included 54 studies, published between 2006 and 2020. Most of the included studies (72%) investigated citizens' knowledge, half of them (56%) attitudes, and 20% educational needs in the field of omics sciences, while 52% investigated attitudes and perceptions about genetic and/or omics tests. Most studies (64%) reported a limited knowledge level among citizens, even though most (59%) reported participants understood the benefits of the use of omics sciences into medicine. As for omics tests, a controversial opinion toward their use into practice was reported among citizens. Most of the studies (82%) investigating citizens' educational needs highlighted a clear gap to be filled. Conclusions: Our SLR summarizes current knowledge on citizens' literacy, attitudes, and educational needs on omics science, underlining the need for strengthening public engagement on this topic. Further research is needed, however, to identify appropriate methods and models to achieve such an improvement.

Keywords: citizens' literacy; educational needs; genetic/omics knowledge; omics sciences; personalized medicine; public attitudes; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process flowchart.

References

    1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium Auton A., Brooks L. D., Durbin R. M., Garrison E. P., Kang H. M., et al. . (2015). A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74. 10.1038/nature15393 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abrams L. R., McBride C. M., Hooker G. W., Cappella J. N., Koehly L. M. (2015). The many facets of genetic literacy: assessing the scalability of multiple measures for broad use in Survey research. PLoS ONE 10:e0141532. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141532 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed S. M., DeFino M., Connors E., Visotcky A., Kissack A., Franco Z. (2017). Science Cafés: Transforming citizens to scientific citizens-What influences participants' perceived change in health and scientific literacy? J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 1, 129–134. 10.1017/cts.2016.24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almeling R. G. S. (2014). Public opinion on policy issues in genetics and genomics. Genet Med. 16, 491–494. 10.1038/gim.2013.175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Society of Human Genetics (2020). Public Attitudes Toward Genetics & Genomics Research Literature and Polling Review Report. Available online at: https://www.ashg.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-Public-Views-Geneti...

Publication types