Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;21(5):177-181.
doi: 10.1177/1757177420921924. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

Comparing national point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infection and antimicrobial prescribing: a methodological approach to adjust for differences in case-mix

Cheryl L Gibbons  1 , Shona Cairns  1 , Aynsley Milne  1 , Melissa Llano  1 , Jennifer Weir  1 , Chris Robertson  2 , Jacqui S Reilly  1
Affiliations

Comparing national point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infection and antimicrobial prescribing: a methodological approach to adjust for differences in case-mix

Cheryl L Gibbons et al. J Infect Prev. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: National point prevalence surveys (PPS) of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) and antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals were conducted in 2011 and 2016 in Scotland. When comparing results of PPS, it is important to adjust for any differences in patient case-mix that may confound the comparison.

Aim: To describe the methodology used to compare prevalence for the two surveys and illustrate the importance of taking case-mix (patient and hospital stay characteristics) into account.

Methods: Multivariate models (clustered logistic regression) that adjusted for differences in patient case-mix were used to describe the difference in prevalence of six outcomes (HAI, antimicrobial prescribing and four devices: central vascular catheter, peripheral vascular catheter, urinary catheterisation and intubation) between the 2011 and 2016 PPS. Univariate models that did not adjust for these differences were also developed for comparison to show the importance of adjusting for confounders.

Results: Without adjustment for case-mix, HAI and intubation prevalence estimates were not significantly different in 2016 compared with 2011 although with adjustment, the prevalence of both was significantly lower (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively). These associations were only identified after adjustment for confounding by case-mix.

Conclusions: While prevalence surveys do not provide intelligence on temporal trends as an incidence-based surveillance system would, if limitations and caveats are acknowledged, it is possible to compare two prevalence surveys to describe changing epidemiology. Adjusting for differences in case-mix is essential for robust comparisons. This methodology may be useful for other countries that are conducting large, repeated prevalence surveys.

Keywords: Prevalence; healthcare-associated infection; multivariate models; patient case-mix; point prevalence survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Brusaferro S, Regattin L, Faruzzo A, Grasso A, Basile M, Calligaris L, Scudeller L, Viale P. (2006) Surveillance of hospital-acquired infections: a model for settings with resource constraints. American Journal of Infection Control 34(6): 362–366. - PubMed
    1. Cairns S, Stewart S, Allardice G, Reilly J. (2009) An adjusted funnel plot methodology for benchmarking targeted local healthcare associated prevalence surveys. Journal of Infection Prevention 10(6): 194–196.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2012) Point prevalence survey of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. Protocol version 4.3. Stockholm: ECDC; Available at: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publicat....
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2016) Point prevalence survey of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. Protocol version 5.3. Stockholm: ECDC; Available at: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/point-prevalence-survey-heal....
    1. French GL, Cheng AF, Wong SL, Donnan S. (1989) Repeated prevalence surveys for monitoring effectiveness of hospital infection control. Lancet 2(8670): 1021–1023. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources