Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 20:10:564382.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564382. eCollection 2020.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Survival Outcomes in Brain Metastasis: A Time Series-Based Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Survival Outcomes in Brain Metastasis: A Time Series-Based Meta-Analysis

Xingjiang Hu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown potential to improve the prognosis of patients with brain metastasis (BM) caused by advanced cancers. However, controversies still exist in regard to its survival benefits. In the present work, a time series-based meta-analysis based on the phase I/II/III trials and observational studies were performed to investigate the differences in mortality of ICI-treated BM patients. A number of public library databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and COCHRANE, were systemically searched by March 2019. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scoring. Outcome measures here established were mortality and progression-free survival (PFS) at different follow-up endpoints. Survival rates and curve data were pooled for further analysis. To detect the data heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were conducted according to tumor and ICI types. Eighteen studies, 6 trials, and 12 controlled cohorts were assessed, involving a total of 1330 ICI-treated BM patients. The 6-month survival rate and PFS were 0.67 (95%CI: 0.59-0.74) and 0.36 (95%CI: 0.24-0.49), respectively. According to the tumor type (melanoma, NSCLC, and RCC), subgroup analyses indicated that melanoma presented the lowest survival rates among the three groups here selected. In regard to the type of ICIs, the anti-CTLA-4 combined with the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 showed the best survival outcome among these groups. The 12-month survival rate and PFS showed a consistent pattern of findings. In the long-term, the 24-month survival rate and PFS were 0.20 (95%CI: 0.12-0.31) and 0.18 (0.05-0.46) in BM patients. Hence, ICI therapy may be associated with an improved prognosis of BM patients. Nevertheless, current research presented a limited study design. Multicenter randomized trials may later assist in validating ICI-based therapies for a better outcome of BM patients.

Keywords: brain metastasis; immune checkpoint inhibitor; meta-analysis; prognosis; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between ICIs and Short-term PFS in BM patients. Forest plots showing 6- and 12-month PFS in BM patients treated with ICIs. ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; BM, brain metastasis; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between ICIs and Short-term Survival in BM patients. Forest plots showing 6- and 12-month survival rate in BM patients, treated with ICIs. ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; BM, brain metastasis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curve of 12-month survival in BM patients treated with ICIs. Kaplan–Meier curve showing pooled 12-month survival in BM patients treated with ICIs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goyal S, Silk AW, Tian S, Mehnert J, Danish S, Ranjan S, et al. . Clinical management of multiple melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol. (2015) 1:668–76. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1206 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balermpas P, Stera S, Müller von der Grün J, Loutfi-Krauss B, Forster MT, Wagner M, et al. . Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort. PLoS One. (2018) 13:e0198692. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198692 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arvold ND, Lee EQ, Mehta MP, Margolin K, Alexander BM, Lin NU, et al. . Updates in the management of brain metastases. Neuro Oncol. (2016) 18:1043–65. 10.1093/neuonc/now127 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE. Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol. (2004) 22:2865–72. 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sampson JH, Carter JH, Friedman AH, Jr, Seigler HF. Demographics, prognosis, and therapy in 702 patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma. J Neurosurg. (1998) 88:11–20. 10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0011 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types