Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 24:7:539925.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.539925. eCollection 2020.

A Review of Pathogen Transmission at the Backyard Chicken-Wild Bird Interface

Affiliations
Review

A Review of Pathogen Transmission at the Backyard Chicken-Wild Bird Interface

Andrea J Ayala et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Habitat conversion and the expansion of domesticated, invasive species into native habitats are increasingly recognized as drivers of pathogen emergence at the agricultural-wildlife interface. Poultry agriculture is one of the largest subsets of this interface, and pathogen spillover events between backyard chickens and wild birds are becoming more commonly reported. Native wild bird species are under numerous anthropogenic pressures, but the risks of pathogen spillover from domestic chickens have been historically underappreciated as a threat to wild birds. Now that the backyard chicken industry is one of the fastest growing industries in the world, it is imperative that the principles of biosecurity, specifically bioexclusion and biocontainment, are legislated and implemented. We reviewed the literature on spillover events of pathogens historically associated with poultry into wild birds. We also reviewed the reasons for biosecurity failures in backyard flocks that lead to those spillover events and provide recommendations for current and future backyard flock owners.

Keywords: backyard chickens; emerging disease; pathogen transmission; wild birds; wildlife-livestock interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gilchrist MJ, Greko C, Wallinga DB, Beran GW, Riley DG, Thorne SP. The potential role of concentrated animal feeding operations in infectious disease epidemics and antibiotic resistance. Environ Health Persp. (2007) 115:313–16. 10.1289/ehp.8837 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renwick AR, White PCL, Bengis RG. Bovine tuberculosis in southern African wildlife: a multi-species host-pathogen system. Epidemiol Infect. (2007) 135:529–40. 10.1017/S0950268806007205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RS, Sweeney SJ, Slootmaker C, Grear DA, Di Salvo PA, Kiser D, et al. . Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America. Scient Rep. (2017) 7:7821. 10.1038/s41598-017-07336-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RS, Farnsworth ML, Malmberg LJ. Diseases at the livestock-wildlife interface: Status, challenges, and opportunities in the United States. Prev Vet Med. (2013) 110:119–32. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobson A, Foufopoulos J. Emerging infectious pathogens of wildlife. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2001) 356:1001–12. 10.1098/rstb.2001.0900 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources