Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse?
- PMID: 33196881
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04476-1
Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse?
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Posterior compartment prolapse is commonly due to a 'true' rectocele, i.e., a diverticulum of the rectal ampulla. This condition is associated with symptoms of obstructed defecation and may contribute to prolapse symptoms. We tested the hypothesis: 'A true rectocele is an independent predictor of symptoms of prolapse.'
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a urogynecology unit for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction between September 2011 and June 2016. Assessment included a structured interview, POP-Q examination and 4D TLUS. Ultrasound volume data were acquired on Valsalva. Offline measurements were performed by analysis of stored volume data sets at a later date, blinded to all clinical data.
Results: One hundred six patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Of the remainder, Bp was the most distal point on POP-Q in 348. Statistical analysis was performed on this cohort. Mean age was 60 (33-86) years and mean BMI 31 (18-55) kg/m². One hundred fifty-three patients (44%) presented with symptoms of prolapse; 272 were diagnosed with a true rectocele on TLUS. Bp on POP-Q and true rectocele on TLUS were both significantly associated with prolapse symptoms; however, on multivariate analysis the latter became nonsignificant (p = 0.059). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed that the presence of a true rectocele on TLUS did not contribute significantly to symptoms of prolapse (AUC 0.66 for model with rectocele, AUC 0.65 without).
Conclusions: The presence of a true rectocele on TLUS does not seem to contribute substantially to the manifestation of clinical symptoms of prolapse.
Keywords: Pelvic organ prolapse; Rectocele; Translabial ultrasound.
© 2020. The International Urogynecological Association.
Comment in
-
A commentary on "Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse?".Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2239. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04508-w. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Int Urogynecol J. 2021. PMID: 32840659 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound scan: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:73–7. - DOI
-
- Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):976–83. - DOI
-
- Bremmer S, Uden R, Mellgren A. Defaeco-peritoneography in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception and rectal prolapse. Acta Radiol. 1997;38(4):578–83. - DOI
-
- Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO, et al. Defecography. Results of investigations in 2816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(11):1133–41. - DOI
-
- Schoenenberger A, Debatin J, Guldenschuh I, Hany T, Steiner P, Krestin G. Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open- configuration MR system. Radiology. 1998;206:641–6. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical