Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Oct;34(5):1681-1696.
doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00896-w. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Surgical versus percutaneous catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Surgical versus percutaneous catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Stepan M Esagian et al. J Nephrol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: No consensus currently exists regarding the optimal approach for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. We aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous and surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placement.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases (end-of-search date: August 29th, 2020). We included studies comparing percutaneous (blind, under fluoroscopic/ultrasound guidance, and "half-perc") and surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placement (open and laparoscopic) in terms of their infectious complications (peritonitis, tunnel/exit-site infections), mechanical complications (leakage, inflow/outflow obstruction, migration, hemorrhage, hernia, bowel perforation) and long-term outcomes (malfunction, removal, replacement, surgery required, and mortality).

Results: Thirty-four studies were identified, including thirty-two observational studies (twenty-six retrospective and six prospective) and two randomized controlled trials. Percutaneous placement was associated with significantly lower rates of tunnel/exit-site infection [relative risk (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.91], catheter migration (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49, 0.95), and catheter removal (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88). The 2-week and 4-week rates of early tunnel/exit-site infection were also lower in the percutaneous group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.93 and RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.63, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding other outcomes, including catheter survival and mechanical complications.

Conclusion: Overall, the quality of published literature on the field of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement is poor, with a small percentage of studies being randomized clinical trials. Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter placement is a safe procedure and may result in fewer complications, such as tunnel/exit-site infections, and catheter migration, compared to surgical placement.

Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42020154951.

Keywords: Laparoscopic catheter placement; Open surgical catheter placement; Percutaneous catheter placement; Peritoneal dialysis catheter.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mehrotra R, Devuyst O, Davies SJ, Johnson DW (2016) The current state of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 27:3238–3252 - DOI
    1. Wong B, Ravani P, Oliver MJ et al (2018) Comparison of patient survival between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis among patients eligible for both modalities. Am J Kidney Dis 71:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crabtree JH, Chow KM (2017) Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Semin Nephrol 37:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.10.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peppelenbosch A, Van Kuijk WHM, Bouvy ND et al (2008) Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications. NDT Plus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfn120 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Shahbazi N, McCormick BB (2011) Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion strategies and maintenance of catheter function. Semin Nephrol 31:138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.01.003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources