Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):395-399.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa263.

Complications related to elective generator replacement of the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator

Affiliations

Complications related to elective generator replacement of the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator

Willeke van der Stuijt et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: To guarantee uninterrupted function of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD), the pulse generator needs to be surgically replaced before the battery is depleted. The risks related to this replacement substantially impact long-term outcome for S-ICD recipients, as the majority will undergo one or several of these procedures in their lifetime. We aim to describe the procedural characteristics of the replacement procedure and to provide an insight in the complications associated with these replacements.

Methods and results: In this retrospective analysis, data from replacement procedures and follow-up visits were collected from all patients who underwent elective S-ICD generator replacement in our tertiary centre from June 2014 until November 2019. Original device position was assessed using the PRAETORIAN score. Complications were defined as those requiring surgical intervention, systemic antibiotic treatment, or device extraction. Seventy-two patients were included, with a median follow-up of 1.9 years (IQR 0.6-3.3 years) after replacement. Battery depletion occurred after 5.9 ± 0.7 years. The pulse generator was repositioned in patients with a PRAETORIAN score ≥90 to minimize the defibrillation threshold. Although there was an increase in impedance compared to the implant procedure, first shock conversion rate during defibrillation testing was 91.4% with a success rate of 100% after multiple attempts. Two patients developed a complication after, respectively, 9 and 21 months, resulting in a complication rate of 1.4% per year.

Conclusion: With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, this study shows a low complication rate after S-ICD replacement, with a first shock conversion rate of 91.4%.

Keywords: Battery longevity; Complication rate; PRAETORIAN score; Pulse generator replacement; Shock impedance; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Improvement of the PRAETORIAN score from 120 (intermediate score) to 60 (low score) by repositioning of the pulse generator (red) during replacement procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in shock impedance between S-ICD implant and replacement per patient (mean in teal). Data are shown from 48 patients with available data on shock impedance of the DFT during implant and replacement procedure. One line may represent multiple patients in case of similar increase/decrease in shock impedance. DFT, defibrillation testing; S-ICD, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Comment in

References

    1. Bardy GH, Smith WM, Hood MA, Crozier IG, Melton IC, Jordaens L. et al. An entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. N Engl J Med 2010;363:36–44. - PubMed
    1. Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A. et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace 2015;17:1601–87. - PubMed
    1. Boston Scientific Corp. Product Details, 2017. http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/products/defibrillators/emblem-s-i... (26 July 2019, date last accessed).
    1. Borleffs CJW, Thijssen J, de Bie MK, van Rees JB, van Welsenes GH, van Erven L. et al. Recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement is associated with an increasing risk of pocket-related complications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33:1013–9. - PubMed
    1. Krahn AD, Lee DS, Birnie D, Healey JS, Crystal E, Dorian P. et al. Predictors of short-term complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement: results from the Ontario ICD Database. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:136–42. - PubMed