Multiple lines of chemotherapy for patients with high-grade ovarian cancer: Predictors for response and effect on survival
- PMID: 33197273
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33395
Multiple lines of chemotherapy for patients with high-grade ovarian cancer: Predictors for response and effect on survival
Abstract
Guidelines for the treatment of tubo-ovarian cancer patients beyond third line are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effect of response in each line on patient's outcome as well as identify variables that predict response for additional line of chemotherapy. A cohort study was performed including all patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Odds ratios and hazard ratios were calculated using multilevel, mixed-effects logistic regression and Cox regression, adjusting for repeated measures within individual patients. Two-hundred thirty-eight patients were included and underwent up to 10 lines of chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival was 15.6 and overall survival (OS) was 55.6 months. Response rates dropped with each additional line and by line 5, most patients (61%) became refractory and only 16% had any type of response (complete 4% or partial 12%). By line 2, whether a patient had partial disease (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) did not have an effect on the OS. From line 2, whether a patient had PR, SD or PD did not have an effect on chemotherapy-free interval. Number of previous lines and time from previous line were the only variables that significantly correlated with both outcome of patients and response to the next line. In conclusion, time interval from the previous line of chemotherapy is the major clinical factor that predicts beneficial effect of another line of treatment in patients with ovarian cancer.
Keywords: high grade; multiple lines of chemotherapy; ovarian cancer; overall survival; response rate.
© 2020 Union for International Cancer Control.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sopik V, Iqbal J, Rosen B, Narod SA. Why have ovarian cancer mortality rates declined? Part I. incidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(3):741-749.
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5-29.
-
- Maringe C, Walters S, Butler J, et al. Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the international cancer benchmarking partnership. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):75-82.
-
- Morgan RJ, Alvarez RD, Armstrong DK, et al. Ovarian cancer, version 3.2012. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(11):1339-1349.
-
- Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(17):3194-3200.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
