Does preoperative diagnosis impact patient outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

Abstract

Background: The indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) have expanded to include the treatment of a wide variety of shoulder pathologies, and there may be significant differences in patient outcomes based on preoperative diagnosis.

Methods: A systematic review of the orthopedic literature contained in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed on November 14, 2019. Studies investigating rTSA indicated for 7 distinct preoperative diagnoses (massive rotator cuff tear [MCT] without glenohumeral osteoarthritis [GHOA], MCT with GHOA or cuff tear arthropathy, primary GHOA, inflammatory arthritis with MCT, failed shoulder arthroplasty, proximal humeral fracture [PHF], and sequelae following PHF) were included. The main outcomes of interest included functional outcomes (abduction, external rotation, and forward flexion) and patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and Constant-Murley score). Because of significant variation in measurement and reporting, data on internal rotation were not extracted. In addition, radiographic outcomes and complication rates were extracted and recorded for each of the included studies.

Results: In total, 47 studies, comprising 2280 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements in functional outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures were found across the preoperative diagnostic groups. There were no significant differences between the diagnostic groups regarding improvement between preoperative and postoperative values for the outcomes of interest, with the exception that the inflammatory arthropathy group had significantly less improvement in the Constant-Murley score than the primary GHOA and revision arthroplasty groups. Although there were few differences in improvement between groups, there were significant differences regarding the level of postoperative functional performance, which was not as consistent in the context of trauma or revision operations (ie, complex PHF, fracture sequela, and revision arthroplasty groups).

Conclusion: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can provide reliable improvement in clinical outcomes regardless of preoperative diagnosis, with few differences across diagnostic groups regarding preoperative to postoperative improvement. The groups with primary GHOA and MCTs with or without GHOA demonstrated the most reliable postoperative functional outcomes of the examined diagnostic groups. Postoperative outcomes were not as consistent in the context of trauma or revision operations, and these groups may benefit from a variety of modern advancements in rTSA, although further research into these modalities for these groups is needed. Finally, rTSA remains an important treatment option in the context of rheumatoid arthritis, with similar outcomes and complication rates compared with the 6 other operative indications.

Keywords: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; functional outcomes; patient-reported outcomes; preoperative diagnosis; radiographic outcomes; shoulder arthroplasty.