Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;35(2):408-416.
doi: 10.1177/0269216320972041. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

A-qCPR risk score screening model for predicting 1-year mortality associated with hospice and palliative care in the emergency department

Affiliations

A-qCPR risk score screening model for predicting 1-year mortality associated with hospice and palliative care in the emergency department

Ruei-Fang Wang et al. Palliat Med. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the need for palliative care and predicting its mortality play important roles in the emergency department.

Aim: We developed a screening model for predicting 1-year mortality.

Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors associated with 1-year mortality. Our risk scores based on these significant risk factors were then developed. Its predictive validity performance was evaluated using area under receiving operating characteristic analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation.

Setting and participants: Patients aged 15 years or older were enrolled from June 2015 to May 2016 in the emergency department.

Results: We identified five independent risk factors, each of which was assigned a number of points proportional to its estimated regression coefficient: age (0.05 points per year), qSOFA ⩾ 2 (1), Cancer (4), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score ⩾ 2 (2), and Do-Not-Resuscitate status (3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of our screening tool given the cutoff larger than 3 points were 0.99 (0.98-0.99), 0.31 (0.29-0.32), 0.26 (0.24-0.27), and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), respectively. Those with screening scores larger than 9 points corresponding to 64.0% (60.0-67.9%) of 1-year mortality were prioritized for consultation and communication. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curves for the point system was 0.84 (0.83-0.85) for the cross-validation model.

Conclusions: A-qCPR risk scores provide a good screening tool for assessing patient prognosis. Routine screening for end-of-life using this tool plays an important role in early and efficient physician-patient communications regarding hospice and palliative needs in the emergency department.

Keywords: DNR; Emergency department; hospice; palliative; performance status score; qSOFA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources