Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 16;21(1):113.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00557-4.

Why have Advance Directives failed in Spain?

Benjamín Herreros  1   2 , María Benito  3 , Pablo Gella  4 , Emanuele Valenti  5 , Beatriz Sánchez  6 , Tayra Velasco  7
Affiliations

Why have Advance Directives failed in Spain?

Benjamín Herreros et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: In Spain, there has been great effort by lawmakers to put Advance Directives (ADs) into practice since 2002. At the same time, the field of bioethics has been on the rise, a discipline that has spurred debate on the right of patients to exercise their autonomy. Despite all this, the implementation of ADs can be said to have failed in Spain, because its prevalence is very low, there is a great lack of knowledge about them and they have very little impact on clinical decisions. The purpose of this article is to analyze and discuss the main reasons for the failure of ADs in Spain.

Main body: The main reasons why ADs have no impact on clinical practice in Spain have been fundamentally four: (1) the training of health professionals about the end of life and AD is lacking; (2) there has been no public process to increase awareness about AD, and therefore people (with the exception of specific highly sensitized groups) know little about them; (3) the bureaucratic procedure to document and implement ADs is excessively complex and cumbersome, creating a significant barrier to their application; (4) in Spain, the remnants of a paternalistic medical culture continue to exist, which causes shared decision-making to be difficult.

Conclusion: Due to the four reasons mentioned above, AD have not been a useful tool to help honor patients' autonomous decisions about their future care and, therefore, they have not achieved their objective. However, despite the difficulties and problems identified, it has also been observed that health care professionals and the Spanish public have a very positive view of AD. Having identified the problems which have kept AD from being successful, strategies must be developed to help improve their implementation into the future.

Keywords: Advance care planning; Advance directive; Living will.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

References

    1. Martínez León M, Queipo Burón D, Martínez León C, Justel Gómez E. Análisis médico-legal de las instrucciones previas (Living Will) en España. Rev Med Legal. 2008;16–30.
    1. Zabala Blanco J, Díaz Ruiz JF. Reflexión sobre el desarrollo y utilidad de las instrucciones previas. Semergen. 2010;36:266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2009.06.003. - DOI
    1. Spanish Register of Advanced Directives. https://www.mscbs.gob.es/ciudadanos/rnip/doc/Documentos-2020/Declarantes.... Accessed 14 Mar 2020.
    1. Gracia Guillén D. Spanish bioethics comes into maturity: personal reflections. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009;18(3):219–227. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109090367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antolín A, Sánchez M, Llorens P, Martín Sánchez FJ, González Armengol JJ, Ituño JP, et al. Knowledge about disease course and living wills among patients with hearth failure. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2010;63(12):1410–1418. doi: 10.1016/S0300-8932(10)70267-0. - DOI - PubMed